Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rzh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.5M
Granted FY2022
28
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$6.2MPhilanthropy$864kArts & Culture$175kEducation$26kHuman Services$20kYouth Development$15kEnvironment$14kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 28 grants below total $659,605, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,480,080 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,820,475 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k12 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $351k
$10,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tzur Foundation$100,920
Cong. Ahavas Tzedoka V'chesed$75,790
Bais Medrash Keren Shiomo$61,850
EOM$59,720
Avihem$52,600
Netzach Foundation$43,800
The Donors Fund$35,000
Cong. Supporters of Torah$30,460
Cong. Kollel Bnei Yeshivos$30,000
Cong. Mosdos Toldos Aharon$27,560
Be'ezri$12,010
BMG Student Aid Fund$10,070
Bnos Leah Prospect Park$10,000
Cong. Zichron Pinchos$10,000
Flatbush Satmar Bikur Cholim$10,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 37 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2022, 22 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
38

Total granted

$6.4M
$1.2M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CZ
    Cong. Zichron Yaakov Yitzchok
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.3M
  • AF
    American Friends of Yeshiva D'mir
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.1M
  • YG
    Yeshiva Gedolah Tiferes Yaakov Yitzchok
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.1M

Funded once

  • FC
    Fidelity Charitable
    one grant, 2021 · $800k
  • M
    Meor
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • KY
    Kamenitzer Yeshiva Of Jerusalem
    one grant, 2018 · $51k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2022.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2022, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cong. Zichron Yaakov Yitzchok: $2,288,365 · OtherCong. Zichron Yaakov YitzchokAmerican Friends of Yeshiva D'mir: $1,125,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of Yeshiva D'mirYeshiva Gedolah Tiferes Yaakov Yitzchok: $1,052,100 · OtherYeshiva Gedolah Tiferes Yaakov YitzchokFidelity Charitable: $800,000 · OtherFidelity Charitable+84 more: $2,602,861 · Other+84 more
Other$7,868,326

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rzh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rzh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $7.0M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rzh’s filings →

More from the funding graph