Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rutland Corner Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$2.1MYouth Development$193kHuman Services$71kHealth$48kCrime & Legal$48kRecreation & Sports$39kArts & Culture$34kEducation$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,129,589
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON WOMEN'S FUND$2,129,589
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CHELSEA COLLABORATIVE INC: $15k → 16%BUDGET BUDDIES INC: $13k → 8%BUDGET BUDDIES INC: $10k → 8%BUDGET BUDDIES INC: $10k → 8%EAST BOSTON ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $10k → 16%EAST BOSTON ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $10k → 16%EAST BOSTON ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $8k → 16%CASA MYRNA VASQUEZ INC: $10k → 16%STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 15 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$2.6M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+106%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +107%
  • GIRLS INCORPORATED OF BOSTON AND LYNN
    5× · 2017–2022 · $63k · revenue +85%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR INCLUSION AND PREVENTION INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $48k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • LA COLABORATIVA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue ×25
  • AC
    AFRICAN COMM ECONOMIC DEVEL OF NE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SOCIEDAD LATINA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts

Lwvma, a nonpartisan organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Civil Rights
2
The Junior League of Boston Inc

The junior league of boston is an organization of women committed to promoting voluntarism, developing the potential of women, and improving communities through the effective action and leadership of trained volunteers. its purpose is…

3
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
4
Female Strong

Female strong is a 501c3 non-profit organization and a community of committed individuals that offer hands-on programs, mentorship, and experiences that build confidence in middle and high school girls. we support the inclusion of all…

Community Improvement
5
Girls Incorporated of New York City

The mission of girls inc. of new york city is to advocate for and improve the lives of underserved girls and youth, ages 6 to 21+, in the five boroughs. we pursue this mission by providing research-based educational programs in the areas…

Civil Rights
6
Browning the Green Space Inc

We seek to facilitate a just energy transition by putting black and brown communities first, and enabling systems change at the intersection of social, environmental, and economic justice. we are powering a just energy transition in the…

Environment
7
The Center for Teen Empowerment Inc

To employ, train, and empower youth to, in collaboration with adults, create peace, equity, and justice.

8
Minds Matter of Boston Inc

Minds matter connects driven and determined students from low-income families with the people, preparation, and possibilities to succeed in college, create their future, and change the world.

Youth Development
9
Girls Incorporated of Metro Denver

To inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold.

Youth Development
10
Girls Inc of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

Our mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold through direct service and advocacy. in partnership with schools and at our girls inc. center, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself,…

11
Girls Incorporated of Long Island

The mission of girls incorporated of long island, is to inspire girls to be strong, smart, and bold. the organization provides school and community based programming that serves the unique needs of girls, ages 5-18, living in the nassau…

Education
12
Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc

To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn and the most unlike its peers is Shooting Touch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC — $2,148,227 · PhilanthropyBOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INCALLIANCE FOR INCLUSION AND PREVENTION INC — $48,000 · OtherALLIANCE F…RAW ART WORKS INC — $40,000 · OtherRAW ART WO…BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $32,500 · OtherBIG SISTER…BIKES NOT BOMBS INC — $30,000 · OtherBIKES NOT …MEDIAGIRLS INC — $22,000 · OtherMEDIAGIRLS…AFRICAN COMM ECONOMIC DEVEL OF NE — $10,000 · OtherLEAP for Education Inc — $31,000 · OtherLEAP for E…JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC — $20,000 · OtherJUSTICE RE…GREENROOTS INC — $10,000 · OtherWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $32,500 · Human ServicesEAST BOSTON COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $28,000 · Human ServicesLA COLABORATIVA INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $5,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF BOSTON AND LYNN — $63,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOCIEDAD LATINA INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHOOTING TOUCH INC — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS — $14,000 · Recreation & SportsMOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC — $27,500 · Community ImprovementTHE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementBOSTON RAISING POWERFUL MUSICIANS — $34,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,148,227Other$243,500Human Services$90,500Youth Development$73,000Recreation & Sports$39,000Community Improvement$37,500Arts & Culture$34,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC — $2,148,227 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF BOSTON AND LYNN — $63,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR INCLUSION AND PREVENTION INC — $48,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetRAW ART WORKS INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBOSTON RAISING POWERFUL MUSICIANS — $34,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $32,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $32,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLEAP for Education Inc — $31,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBIKES NOT BOMBS INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetEAST BOSTON COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $28,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC — $27,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSHOOTING TOUCH INC — $25,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMEDIAGIRLS INC — $22,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS — $14,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIEDAD LATINA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREENROOTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anna B Stearns Charitable Foundation IncMA28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anna B Stearns Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Barr Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Rockland Trust - East Boston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Adelard & Valeda Roy Foundation · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rutland Corner Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • La Colaborativa Inc51% of income from government
  • Justice Resource Institute Inc50% of income from government
  • Alliance for Inclusion and Prevention Inc34% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn26% of income from government
  • Raw Art Works Inc11% of income from government
  • The Hyde Square Task Force Inc11% of income from government
  • Sociedad Latina Inc10% of income from government
  • Women's Money Matters Inc7% of income from government
  • Greenroots Inc6% of income from government
  • Bikes Not Bombs Inc6% of income from government
  • Leap for Education Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rutland Corner Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rutland Corner Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph