Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth Jones Macdonald Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$427k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.4MHuman Services$438kEducation$430kPhilanthropy$155kArts & Culture$120kReligion$25kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $420k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RE MIND$30,000
NICK FINNEGAN COUNSELING CENTER$30,000
INSTITUTE FOR SPIRITUALITY AND HEALTH$25,000
BO'S PLACE$25,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$25,000
BE PEACE - BE HOPE$25,000
SOLEANA STABLES$25,000
HOPE AND HEALING CENTER$25,000
SHARPEN RECOVERY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
THE COUNCIL ON RECOVERY$20,000
COUNSELING CONNECTIONS FOR CHANGE$20,000
ARCHWAY ACADEMY$20,000
THE MENNINGER CLINIC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SOLEANA STABLES: $25k → 10%SOLEANA STABLES: $15k → 10%SOLEANA STABLES: $10k → 10%SoleAna Stables: $8k → 10%COUNSELING CONNECTIONS FOR CHANGE: $20k → 10%COUNSELING CONNECTIONS FOR CHANGE: $20k → 10%COUNSELING CONNECTIONS FOR CHANGE: $20k → 10%Counseling Connections for Change: $15k → 10%Counseling Connections for Change: $10k → 10%TEEN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%TEEN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%Teen and Family Services: $8k → 16%Teen and Family Services: $5k → 16%Teen and Family Services: $5k → 16%Teen and Family Services: $5k → 16%Teen and Family Services: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 24 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$2.4M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ARCHWAY ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +21%
  • R
    REMIND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $245k · revenue +32%
  • TM
    THE MENNINGER CLINIC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $200k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • DA
    Depression and Bipolar Support Alli
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • MH
    MEMORIAL HERMANN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • UO
    University of Houston Clear Lake
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Serenity Retreat for Healing and Spiritual Renewal

Serenity Retreat exists to equip all generations in a prayer process that allows for a transformational encounter with God.

Religion
2
Trc the Recovery Center

Our continuing mission is to change the lives of those who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction.

Health
3
Communities for Recovery

Communities for Recovery supports long-term recovery for people with substance use and co-occurring mental health issues by partnering with other organizations in the community to provide peer-supported recovery services.

Health
4
Houston Area Parkinson Society

The mission of the Houston Area Parkinson Society is to use a whole-human approach to community building, which reduces the fear and isolation associated with a Parkinson's diagnosis.

—
5
West Street Recovery

West Street Recovery's mission is to connect communities to the resources they need to rebuild after climate disasters such as Hurricane Harvey and build resilient, secure, and stronger communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Endeavors Health Services Board

Endeavors Health Services Board provides in-person and virtual, high-quality, accessible and integrated behavioral healthcare to the community.

Health
7
The Center for Integrative Counseling and Psychology

Our mission is to provide accessible high-quality counseling, training, psychological evaluations, and educational testing that equip our clients to grow through lifes changes and challenges.

Health
8
House of Hope Inc

To provide licensed substance use and mental health disorder treatment to those affected by substance and mental health issues.

Health
9
Relate Inc

Relate has provided community based mental and chemical health services since 1969. Our mission is to provide high-quality, culturally responsive, inclusive mental health services to our community. Relate is an Essential Community…

Human Services
10
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
11
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
12
Houston's Amazing Place Inc

Amazing Place empowers families facing the challenges of dementia and Alzheimer's and advances brain health for all. The Organization serves adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate dementia, caregiving families and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Centro De Corazon; the most unlike its peers is Tgp Public Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hope and Healing Center: $265,000 · OtherHope and Healing CenterREMIND: $245,000 · OtherREMINDNICK FINNEGAN COUNSELING CENTER: $155,000 · OtherNICK FINNEGAN COUNSELING CENTERHouston Recovery Center: $57,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherPASSAGES INC: $46,000 · OtherSt Luke's Hospital: $45,000 · OtherInstitute for Spirituality and Health at the Texas Medical Center: $40,000 · Other+10 more: $207,000 · Other+10 moreARCHWAY ACADEMY: $255,000 · EducationARCHWAY ACADEMYThe Brookwood Community Inc: $75,000 · EducationThe Brookwood Com…TGP Public Schools: $60,000 · EducationTGP Public School…BE PEACE - BE HOPE: $40,000 · EducationBE PEACE - BE HOP…THE MENNINGER CLINIC: $200,000 · HealthTHE MENNINGER CLI…The Council on Recovery: $185,000 · HealthThe Council on Re…Memorial Hermann Foundation: $20,000 · Health+2 more: $20,000 · HealthOpen Door Mission: $125,000 · Human ServicesOpen Door Mis…Counseling Connections for Change Inc: $85,000 · Human ServicesCounseling Co…SOLEANA STABLES: $57,500 · Human ServicesSOLEANA STABL…Teen & Family Services: $47,500 · Human ServicesTeen & Family…EL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $180,000 · Crime & LegalGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $155,000 · PhilanthropyBo's Place: $120,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,110,000Education$430,000Health$425,000Human Services$315,000Crime & Legal$180,000Philanthropy$155,000Arts & Culture$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARCHWAY ACADEMY: $255,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetREMIND: $245,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC: $200,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Council on Recovery: $185,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $180,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Door Mission: $125,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetBo's Place: $120,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCounseling Connections for Change Inc: $85,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $75,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOLEANA STABLES: $57,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTeen & Family Services: $47,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPASSAGES INC: $46,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetInstitute for Spirituality and Health at the Texas Medical Center: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBE PEACE - BE HOPE: $40,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetMemorial Hermann Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARCHWAY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds REMIND ↗
  • Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds The Council on Recovery ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE CORAZON ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Open Door Mission ↗
  • Who funds Bo's Place ↗
  • Who funds Counseling Connections for Change Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds TGP Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds SOLEANA STABLES ↗
  • Who funds Teen & Family Services ↗
  • Who funds PASSAGES INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Spirituality and Health at the Texas Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds BE PEACE - BE HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Sharpen Recovery ↗
  • Who funds Memorial Hermann Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX26.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Marek Family Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · John S Dunn Foundation · Hamill Foundation · MD Anderson Foundation · Vivian L Smith Foundation · John P McGovern Foundation · Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services · Strake Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth Jones Macdonald Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth Jones Macdonald Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth Jones Macdonald’s filings →

    More from the funding graph