· Public charity
Rush Health Systems Inc
Provision of health care services through affiliates see schedule o for community benefit statement
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RUSH MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC | $10,920,974 |
| LAIRD HOSPITAL INC | $1,429,434 |
| RUSH HOSPITAL - BUTLER INC | $471,971 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 25%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -5% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- RMRUSH MEDICAL FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $45M · revenue +7%
- KCKEMPER CAH INC3× · 2017–2019 · $12M · revenue +3% · 40% of their budget
- RHRUSH HOSPITAL - BUTLER INC4× · 2017–2021 · $5.1M · revenue +28%
Funded once
- RHRUSH HOME CARE INCone grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue -6%
- ECEAST CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +133%
- MSMERIDIAN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -6%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide health care services
Provision of health care services through affiliates see schedule o for community benefit statement
Provide financial assistance to health care related causes in and around central mississippi and alabama
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate. ochsner will be a global medical and academic leader who will save and change lives. we will shape the future of healthcare through our integrated health system, fueled by the passion and…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The mission of Rush University System for Health is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities it serves through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research, and community partnerships.
To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.
One brooklyn health system, inc. provides greater access to high quality medical care and keeps our communities healthy through an integrated care system that respects the diversity of our communities and addresses both the health needs…
The organization was organized for the benefit and support of its related 501(c)(3) health care entities which provide medical care to restore, maintain and improve the health of the community in which it serves.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RUSH MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEMPER CAH INC ↗
- Who funds RUSH HOSPITAL - BUTLER INC ↗
- Who funds RUSH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds LAIRD HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RUSH MEDICAL GROUP OF NEWTON PA ↗
- Who funds RUSH HOME CARE INC ↗
- Who funds EAST CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Medical Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Rush Health Systems Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rush Health Systems Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Rush Health Systems’ filings →