Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rupe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$365kRecreation & Sports$130kFood & Nutrition$100kHousing & Shelter$45kEnvironment$30kEducation$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOMENTOUS INSTITUTE$35,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER$30,000
DALLAS ARBORETUM$30,000
PARKLAND HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
LAKE COUNTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%North Texas Food Bank: $20k → 5%LAKE COUNTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10k → 11%MOMENTOUS INSTITUTE: $35k → 14%North Texas Food Bank: $20k → 5%Dallas 24 Hour Club Inc: $15k → 14%North Texas Food Bank: $20k → 5%DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $15k → 14%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $20k → 5%Dallas 24 Hour Club Inc: $15k → 14%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $20k → 5%DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $15k → 14%Dallas 24 Hour Club Inc: $10k → 14%DALLAS ARBORETUM: $30k → 14%Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Soci: $15k → 14%Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Soci: $15k → 14%Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Soci: $15k → 14%Dallas Arboretum Botanical Societ: $15k → 14%Dallas Arboretum Botanical Societ: $15k → 14%Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Soci: $15k → 14%DALLAS ARBORETUM BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 14%DALLAS ARBORETUM BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 14%DALLAS ARBORETUM BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 14%DALLAS ARBORETUM BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 14%Callier Foundation: $30k → 14%Callier Foundation: $30k → 14%Callier Foundation: $30k → 14%CALLIER FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER: $30k → 14%CALLIER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%Parkland Foundation Inc: $30k → 14%PARKLAND FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%PARKLAND FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%PARKLAND HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%Parkland Foundation Inc: $10k → 14%Parkland Foundation Inc: $10k → 14%SHELTER MINISTRIES DALLAS - GENESIS: $15k → 14%SHELTER MINISTRIES DALLAS - GENESIS: $15k → 14%Genesis Womens Shelter Support: $10k → 14%Genesis Womens Shelter Support: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$545k · 8 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$545k
$30k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PARKLAND FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +30%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +35%
  • D2
    DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • DA
    Dallas Arboretum Botanical Societ
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Callier Foundation: $120,000 · OtherCallier FoundationNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $100,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $70,000 · OtherDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INCDallas Arboretum and Botanical Soci: $60,000 · OtherDallas Arboretum and Botanical SociDALLAS ARBORETUM BOTANICAL GARDEN: $40,000 · OtherDALLAS ARBORETUM BOTANICAL GARDENDallas Arboretum Botanical Societ: $30,000 · OtherDallas Arboretum Botanical SocietSHELTER MINISTRIES DALLAS - GENESIS: $30,000 · OtherSHELTER MINISTRIES DALLAS - GENESISFOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER: $30,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER+2 more: $25,000 · OtherPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $110,000 · HealthPARKLAND FOUNDATIO…Momentous Institute: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · Environment
Other$505,000Health$110,000Youth Development$35,000Environment$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLAKE COUNTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rupe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rupe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rupe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rupe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rupe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph