· Private foundation
Rrn Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Various | $24,787 |
| TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVRAHAM INC | $17,600 |
| keren hatorah / tiferes yakov | $3,000 |
| agudath yisroel of cleveland | $1,000 |
| The Downos Fund | $1,000 |
| Tzur Foundation | $850 |
| CHA/4EVER | $700 |
| BEIS HAMEDRESH BEIS YECHEL DALESKAND | $400 |
| CONGREGATION SHEIFA CHAIM SANZ LAKE | $400 |
| Eli Raitzik Tutoring Fund | $400 |
| birchos shamoyim of koasho / the dacha | $300 |
| CONGREGATION YESHIVA BAIS YISROEL INC | $300 |
| Keren Hachnosas Kallah of Elmwood | $300 |
| UTA | $200 |
| Ohr Nosson Inc | $150 |
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BMBais Medrash of Elmwood Village4× · 2018–2022 · $20k
- BMBAIS MEDRASH OF ROCKLAND INC3× · 2021–2023 · $10k
- TFTZUR FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- YTYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel Chaimone grant, 2023 · $11k
- CKCongregation Karnel Riem Verdanone grant, 2022 · $6k
- BMBais Medrash Shari Tefilahone grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
Play a game based on Rrn’s filings →