Skip to content
Rowena Yarak Schaber Scholarship Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rowena Yarak Schaber Scholarship Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.2MHuman Services$185kPhilanthropy$100kSocial Science$50kArts & Culture$50kReligion$50kHealth$30kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Manual Arts$50,000
Bridge Builders$50,000
California State University -Long B$25,000
BaldenScanlin Scholarship Fund$19,000
IBECC$10,000
Assistance League of Huntington Bea$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Child Education Center: $30k → 14%Child Education Center: $20k → 14%Child Education Center: $15k → 14%Child Education Center: $15k → 14%Child Education Center: $15k → 14%Child Education Center: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+39%

Still filing today

58%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementScience & TechHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    Child Education Center
    6× · 2017–2022 · $105k · revenue +44%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE HUNTINGTON BEACH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +20%
  • ME
    MIND EDUCATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $65k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MATTHEW AND ROBERTA JENKINS FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +39% · 28% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • GS
    Guardin Scholars Cal State Universi
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blsj Scholarship Foundation
—
2
James F Byrnes Foundation
—
3
Li Educational Foundation
Human Services
4
Ruby Jolliffe Scholarship Foundation
International
5
Bridge California

Education

Education
6
Partners in Education
Education
7
Lindsay Educational Foundation
Education
8
Stanbridge University Foundation
Education
9
John Huntington Fund for Education
—
10
William M Shinnick Educational Fund
—
11
Foundation for Educational Excellence
Philanthropy
12
Education Legacy Fund
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Long Beach Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is BaldenScanlin Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $350,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCalifornia State University -Long B: $100,000 · OtherCalifornia State University -Long BIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientManual Arts: $50,000 · OtherManual ArtsMind Research Institute: $50,000 · OtherMind Research Institute+6 more: $38,500 · Other+6 moreLong Beach Education Foundation: $285,000 · EducationLong Beach Education FoundationBaldenScanlin Scholarship Fund Inc: $226,900 · EducationBaldenScanlin Scholarship Fund IncLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $62,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYChild Education Center: $105,000 · Human ServicesTHE MATTHEW AND ROBERTA JENKINS FAMILY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyASSISTANCE LEAGUE HUNTINGTON BEACH: $80,000 · Community ImprovementMIND EDUCATION: $65,000 · Science & TechBRIDGE BUILDERS aka PENINSULA HARVEST COMMUNITY FELLOWS: $50,000 · ReligionPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Health
Other$648,500Education$573,900Human Services$105,000Philanthropy$100,000Community Improvement$80,000Science & Tech$65,000Religion$50,000Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLong Beach Education Foundation: $285,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetBaldenScanlin Scholarship Fund Inc: $226,900 over 6y, 67% of budgetChild Education Center: $105,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTHE MATTHEW AND ROBERTA JENKINS FAMILY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE HUNTINGTON BEACH: $80,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetMIND EDUCATION: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $62,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Long Beach Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BaldenScanlin Scholarship Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Child Education Center ↗
  • Who funds THE MATTHEW AND ROBERTA JENKINS FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE HUNTINGTON BEACH ↗
  • Who funds MIND EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE BUILDERS aka PENINSULA HARVEST COMMUNITY FELLOWS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rowena Yarak Schaber Scholarship Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rowena Yarak Schaber Scholarship Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rowena Yarak Schaber Scholarship Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rowena Yarak Schaber Scholarship Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rowena Yarak Schaber Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home