Skip to content

· Public charity

Rotary International District 7870

To take action on our world's most persistent issues: promote peace, fight disease, provide clean water/sanitation/hygiene, save mothers and children, support education, grow local economies.

$342k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$172kFood & Nutrition$93kCommunity Improvement$74kInternational$7kPhilanthropy$7kPublic Benefit$5kEducation$3k
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $321,251, the rows itemized in this filing. The $342,326 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,075 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k8 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $136k
$12,079
Median grant
2
States reached
$119k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Hampshire Food Bank$75,963
Rotary Club of Nashua$60,222
Rotary Club of Meredith NH$30,009
Rotary Club of Manchester$19,316
HollisBrookline Rotary$17,401
Rutland Rotary International$16,963
Vermont Foodbank$16,696
Rotary Club of Hopkinton$14,974
Rotary Club of Raymond Area$12,079
Gilford Rotary Club$8,410
Capital City Sunrise Concord$8,160
Rotary Club of Wallingford VT$8,000
Bellows Falls Rotary Club$7,564
Rotary Club of Milford$6,682
United Way of Rutland County$6,637
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%New Hampshire Food Bank: $76k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 8 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$71k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-20%
+35%

Still filing today

63%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $273k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF RUTLAND VERMONT
    3× · 2017–2021 · $19k · revenue -31% · 46% of their budget
  • RI
    Rotary International-Rotary Club Of Hopkinton NH
    2× · 2018–2021 · $17k · revenue +23%
  • CC
    CAPITAL CITY SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB
    3× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue -52% · 97% of their budget

Funded once

  • HB
    HOLLIS BROOKLINE ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF MERRIMACK SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • DR
    Derry Rotary Clubgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Primary purpose is to raise funds in order to assist NGOs in their mission to offer aid to those in need regardless of age. Particular focus is to aid those programs that administer aid to younger people under the age of 18.

—
2
Hartford Rotary Club

Service in the community worldwide

—
3
Rotary International

Service club

—
4
Rotary Club of Winters Community Foundation
Education
5
Rotary Club of Andover Charitable Trust

Fundraising to service community and worldwide needy organization

Philanthropy
6
Rotary International Walla Walla Sunrise Rotary Club

Public Service. Rotarians are involved in community service and other activities to benefit the community and youth.

—
7
Rotary Club of Ridgefield

Community & civic activities

—
8
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

—
9
Rotary International Menomonie Rotary

A fellowship of individuals who are focused on supporting their community and building bridges between nations.

—
10
Rotary Club of Rhinebeck New York

Community Service.

—
11
Rotary Club of Attleboro Ma Inc

Voluntary group of area businessmen and businesswomen. members dues and assessments as well as public support used to enrich the local community as well as international projects.

—
12
Rotary International

to provide community as well as worlwide assistance to those in need.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary Club of Rutland Vermont; the most unlike its peers is New Hampshire Catholic Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rotary Club of Nashua: $60,222 · OtherRotary Club of NashuaROTARY CLUB OF RUTLAND VERMONT: $19,463 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF RUTLAND VERMONTRotary Club of Manchester: $19,316 · OtherRotary Club of ManchesterHOLLIS BROOKLINE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $17,401 · OtherHOLLIS BROOKLINE ROTARY FOUNDATION INCRotary International-Rotary Club Of Hopkinton NH: $16,974 · OtherRotary International-Rotary Club Of Hopkinton NHRotary Club of Raymond Area: $12,079 · OtherCAPITAL CITY SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB: $11,560 · OtherGilford Rotary Club: $10,910 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 · Other+19 more: $61,587 · Other+19 moreNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $75,963 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic …MEREDITH ROTARY CLUB INC: $30,009 · Community ImprovementMEREDITH …VERMONT FOODBANK: $16,696 · Food & Nutrition
Other$237,512Human Services$75,963Community Improvement$30,009Food & Nutrition$16,696

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $75,963 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEREDITH ROTARY CLUB INC: $30,009 over 1y, 22% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF RUTLAND VERMONT: $19,463 over 3y, 46% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $16,696 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL CITY SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB: $11,560 over 3y, 97% of budgetGilford Rotary Club: $10,910 over 3y, 26% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RUTLAND COUNTY INC: $6,637 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDerry Rotary Club: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLUDLOW ROTARY CLUB: $2,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetKEENE ELM CITY ROTARY CLUB: $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL - BRATTLEBORO ROTARY CLUB: $1,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds MEREDITH ROTARY CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF RUTLAND VERMONT ↗
  • Who funds Rotary International-Rotary Club Of Hopkinton NH ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL CITY SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Gilford Rotary Club ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF RUTLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Derry Rotary Club ↗
  • Who funds LUDLOW ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds KEENE ELM CITY ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL - BRATTLEBORO ROTARY CLUB ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International District 7870 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International District 7870. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rotary International District 7870?

Find your warmest path to Rotary International District 7870 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $28k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rotary International District 7870’s filings →

More from the funding graph