Skip to content
Rotary International District 7750 at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Rotary International District 7750

To encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$107kEducation$63kRecreation & Sports$49kInternational$48kYouth Development$32kHealth$14kHousing & Shelter$12kCivil Rights$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $150,672 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $143,672 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$364k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REEDY RIVER ROTARY CLUB$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REEDY RIVER ROTARY CLUB: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of Rotary International District 7750’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in SC; by stated purpose, 51%.

Rotary International District 7750lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$139k · 6 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$139k
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+5%

Still filing today

17%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EMERALD CITY ROTARY CLUB
    5× · 2018–2023 · $51k · revenue +7% · 25% of their budget
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF GREENVILLE EAST
    2× · 2019–2020 · $27k
  • RY
    ROTARY YOUTH EXCHANGE--DISTRICT 7750
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k

Funded once

  • PI
    PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • FM
    Fort Mill Rotary Club Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +33%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF ANDERSON
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Service club

—
2
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

—
3
Rotary International

to provide community as well as worlwide assistance to those in need.

—
4
Rotary International Dublin Am Rotary Club

Raising funds to provide community service at home and throughout the world.

—
5
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Rotary International

The object of the rotary is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.

—
7
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

—
8
Rotary Club of Winters Community Foundation
Education
9
Rotary Charities Inc

Community Service

Education
10
Rotary International Walla Walla Sunrise Rotary Club

Public Service. Rotarians are involved in community service and other activities to benefit the community and youth.

—
11
Rotary eClub One Inc

Provide assistance to organizations that help with disaster relief in the U.S and other countries.

—
12
Rotary Club of Charlotte South

Benefit community & charitable organizations

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Mill Rotary Club; the most unlike its peers is Rotary International - Greenville Rotary Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC: $99,853 · OtherPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INCEMERALD CITY ROTARY CLUB: $50,998 · OtherEMERALD CITY ROTARY CLUBROTARY CLUB OF GREENVILLE EAST: $27,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF GREENVILLE EASTROTARY YOUTH EXCHANGE--DISTRICT 7750: $19,540 · OtherROTARY YOUTH EXCHANGE--DISTRICT 7750ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $13,953 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALROTARY CLUB OF REEDY RIVER GREENVIL: $12,940 · Other+5 more: $36,534 · Other+5 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $47,568 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUN…Rotary 7750 Charities Inc: $14,976 · PhilanthropyFort Mill Rotary Club Foundation: $9,000 · PhilanthropyGreenville Evening Rotary Charities: $7,000 · Human Services
Other$260,818International$47,568Philanthropy$23,976Human Services$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMERALD CITY ROTARY CLUB: $50,998 over 5y, 25% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $47,568 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRotary 7750 Charities Inc: $14,976 over 2y, 58% of budgetFort Mill Rotary Club Foundation: $9,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF ANDERSON: $8,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF EASLEY SC: $7,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL - GREENVILLE ROTARY CLUB: $7,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetGreenville Evening Rotary Charities: $7,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetFort Mill Rotary Club: $6,700 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International District 7750 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International District 7750. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International District 7750’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home