Skip to content
Rotary International District 6600 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rotary International District 6600

Provide services to rotary clubs.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Public Benefit$56kEducation$50kCommunity Improvement$44kInternational$37kEmployment$11kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $55,927, the rows itemized in this filing. The $219,197 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $163,270 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$9,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$16,500
ROTARY CLUB OF ELYRIA$10,500
ROTARY CLUB OF VERMILION$9,750
ROTARY CLUB OF BUCYRUS$7,359
ROTARY CLUB OF ST MARYS$6,400
ROTARY CLUB OF MANSFIELD$5,418
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE DISTRICT HEALTH AND EDUCATION FOUDNATION: $5k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF ST MARYS: $6k → 8%ROTARY CLUB OF VERMILION: $14k → 11%TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%ROTARY CLUB OF UPPER SANDUSKY: $8k → 12%ROTARY CLUB OF ELYRIA: $11k → 13%ROTARY CLUB OF BUCYRUS: $7k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF MANSFIELD: $5k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF SYLVANIA: $7k → 18%ROTARY FOUNDATION: $37k → 14%ROTARY CLUB OF VERMILION: $10k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF OBERLIN: $8k → 13%ROTARY CLUB OF BUCYRUS: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF SYLVANIA: $7k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF MAUMEE: $22k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF MAUMEE: $7k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF WATERVILLE: $12k → 18%ROTARY DISTRICT 6600: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 4 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +159% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$79k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+159%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MAUMEE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $28k · revenue +465% · 85% of their budget
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF BUCYRUS
    2× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +159%
  • SC
    SYLVANIA COMMUNITY ROTARY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +62% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • WR
    WATERVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • MR
    MARION ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +3%
  • OR
    OBERLIN ROTARY MEMORIAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +107%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Murray Rotary Club Foundation
—
2
Massillon Rotary Foundation Trust
Community Improvement
3
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

—
4
Rotary Club of West Liberty Iowa

Charitable work in community world

—
5
The Foundation of the Rotary Club of White Plains Ny

To provide college scholarships and other charitable purposes

Education
6
Olentangy Rotary Foundation

To provide support for local, national and international humanitarian programs and projects and relief efforts and to provide scholarship funds to college bound students.

Human Services
7
River Falls Rotary Club

Community/World Service

—
8
Rotary Club of Winters Community Foundation
Education
9
Franklin Rotary Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Rotary Club of Montgomeryrocky Hill Foundation Inc

The men and women of rotary are business and professional leaders who volunteer their time and resources to help others in their local communities and throughout the world. the objective of the rotary foundation is to raise funds and make…

Education
11
Rotary District 5190 Community Fund

To support rotary district 5190 projects

Philanthropy
12
Rotary International

Rotary club of superior is a service organization located in superior, wi and chartered under rotary international. the club members donate hundreds of hours annually to different projects and fundraisers in the community and contribute…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elyria Sunrise Rotary Club of Elyria Ohio Usa; the most unlike its peers is Ohio State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAUMEE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $28,380 · OtherMAUMEE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATIONROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $23,885 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALROTARY CLUB OF BUCYRUS: $13,684 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF BUCYRUSSYLVANIA COMMUNITY ROTARY FOUNDATION: $13,150 · OtherSYLVANIA COMMUNITY ROTARY FOUNDATIONELYRIA SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB OF ELYRIA OHIO USA: $10,500 · OtherELYRIA SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB OF ELYRIA OHIO USAROTARY CLUB OF UPPER SANDUSKY: $8,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF UPPER SANDUSKYMEDICAL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES ABROAD FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · OtherMEDICAL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES ABROAD FOUNDATION INCST MARYS ROTARY CLUB: $6,400 · OtherST MARYS ROTARY CLUBMANSFIELD ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $5,418 · OtherTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $37,399 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATIO…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,500 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIV…WATERVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $11,808 · EducationWATERVILLE ROTA…MARION ROTARY FOUNDATION: $8,867 · PhilanthropyTHE TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyOBERLIN ROTARY MEMORIAL FUND: $8,433 · Community ImprovementROTARY DISTRICT 6000 HUMANITARIAN AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$116,417International$37,399Education$28,308Philanthropy$13,867Community Improvement$13,433

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $37,399 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUMEE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $28,380 over 2y, 85% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF BUCYRUS: $13,684 over 2y, 21% of budgetSYLVANIA COMMUNITY ROTARY FOUNDATION: $13,150 over 2y, 26% of budgetMARION ROTARY FOUNDATION: $8,867 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetOBERLIN ROTARY MEMORIAL FUND: $8,433 over 1y, 18% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF UPPER SANDUSKY: $8,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetST MARYS ROTARY CLUB: $6,400 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROTARY DISTRICT 6000 HUMANITARIAN AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International District 6600 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International District 6600. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rotary International District 6600?

    Find your warmest path to Rotary International District 6600 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International District 6600’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home