Skip to content
Rotary International District 6080 at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Rotary International District 6080

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world.

$188k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$258kInternational$33k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $59,582, the rows itemized in this filing. The $188,239 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $128,657 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$227k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast$48,075
Rotary Club Of Columbia Metro$6,000
Rotary Club of Jefferson City Breakfast$5,507
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Rotary Club of Warrensburg: $30k → 14%Rotary Club of Columbia South: $21k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield: $11k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $10k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $10k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Metro: $9k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $8k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise: $8k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield: $7k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $6k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $6k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield: $6k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise: $6k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise: $5k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield: $50k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $48k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield: $22k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield: $11k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise: $10k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield: $8k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise: $8k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $7k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Southeast: $7k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise: $7k → 15%Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 4 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$279k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
-3%

Still filing today

100%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF SPRINGFIELD INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +71%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL CLUB SPRINGFIELD SUNRISE MO USA
    6× · 2018–2024 · $41k · revenue +79%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF COLUMBIA SOUTH
    2× · 2018–2019 · $27k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF WARRENSBURG MO CHARI
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -90% · 40% of their budget
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • RC
    Rotary Club of Springfield Sunrise
    one grant, 2025 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Service club

—
2
Rotary International Dublin Am Rotary Club

Raising funds to provide community service at home and throughout the world.

—
3
Rotary International

Rotary club of superior is a service organization located in superior, wi and chartered under rotary international. the club members donate hundreds of hours annually to different projects and fundraisers in the community and contribute…

—
4
Rotary International Ste Genevieve Rotary Club

To provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

—
5
Rotary International Boone Rotary Club

Community service club that provides educational & charitable assistance to boone county, iowa.

—
6
Rotary International - Souderton-Telford

A service org. that contrib. to the community & provides volunteer services.

—
7
Rotary International

The object of the rotary is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.

—
8
Rotary International Schaumburg

Foster community service

—
9
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

—
10
Rotary International

We provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

—
11
Rotary International Walla Walla Sunrise Rotary Club

Public Service. Rotarians are involved in community service and other activities to benefit the community and youth.

—
12
Rotary International

to provide community as well as worlwide assistance to those in need.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary International Columbia Rotary Club; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Warrensburg Mo Chari. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY INTERNATIONAL SPRINGFIELD SOUTHEAST CLUB: $96,750 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL SPRINGFIELD SOUTHEAST CLUBROTARY INTERNATIONAL CLUB SPRINGFIELD SUNRISE MO USA: $40,890 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL CLUB SPRINGFIELD SUNRISE MO USAROTARY CLUB OF WARRENSBURG MO CHARI: $30,250 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF WARRENSBURG MO CHARIROTARY CLUB OF COLUMBIA SOUTH: $26,800 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF COLUMBIA SOUTHROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $9,300 · Other+5 more: $30,917 · Other+5 moreROTARY CLUB OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $114,825 · Community ImprovementROTARY CLUB OF SPRINGFIELD INC
Other$234,907Community Improvement$114,825

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY CLUB OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $114,825 over 7y, 21% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL SPRINGFIELD SOUTHEAST CLUB: $96,750 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL CLUB SPRINGFIELD SUNRISE MO USA: $40,890 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF WARRENSBURG MO CHARI: $30,250 over 1y, 40% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL COLUMBIA ROTARY CLUB: $5,810 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International District 6080 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International District 6080. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rotary International District 6080?

    Find your warmest path to Rotary International District 6080 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International District 6080’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home