Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rotary International District 5500 Inc

The mission of the Rotary International is to provide service to others, promote intgrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill and peace through its fellowship of business,professional and community leaders

$58k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Community Improvement$66kRecreation & Sports$35kYouth Development$35kHealth$26kEducation$17kPhilanthropy$16kArts & Culture$13kHuman Services$12kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $32,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $57,980 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,980 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$223k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY CLUB OF TUBAC$8,000
ROTARY CLUB OF YUMA$6,000
ROTARY CLUB OF SIERRA VISTA SUNRISE$6,000
ROTARY CLUB OF FORT YUMA$6,000
ROTARY CLUB OF YUMA FOOTHILLS$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROTARY CLUB OF SADDLEBROOKE SUNRISE: $1k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF FORT YUMA: $8k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF CATALINA: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF BISBEE CHARITIES: $5k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF TUBAC: $8k → 19%ROTARY CLUB DOVE MOUNTAIN: $6k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF FORT YUMA: $8k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF CATALINA: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF FORT YUMA: $7k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF TUCSON SUNRISE: $8k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF FORT YUMA: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF VAIL (ARIZONA): $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF FORT YUMA: $5k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF VAIL (ARIZONA): $5k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF YUMA FOOTHILLS: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF GREEN VALLEY: $3k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF YUMA FOOTHILLS: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF VALLE VERDE: $2k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF FORT YUMA: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF ORO VALLEY: $6k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF PANTANO: $3k → 15%ROTARY CLUB ORO VALLEY: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Rotary International District 5500 Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in AZ; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Rotary International District 5500 Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$151k · 9 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$151k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
-2%

Still filing today

67%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FY
    Fort Yuma Rotary Club Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +91%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL YUMA FOOTHILLS ROTARY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +84%
  • CR
    CATALINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF TUCSON SUNRISE
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF YUMA FOOTHILLS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International Taos Milagro

Taos Milagro Rotary Club provides college scholarships for local high school students, delivers literacy programs for local elementary school students, provides grants to local community organizations, and provides local support for…

2
Rotary International

Service club

3
Mesa West Rotary Foundation Inc

Humanitarian relief which donates time and funds to advance world understanding, goodwill and peace through the improvement of health, the support of education, and the alleviation of poverty.

Philanthropy
4
The Rotary Club of Snoqualmie Valley

Service and funding to various organizations throughout our community and worldwide.

Human Services
5
Rotary International Sunrise Club

Humanitarian Service

6
Rotary International

to provide community as well as worlwide assistance to those in need.

7
Greater Clark County Rotary Foundation

Net proceeds from fundraisers used to support educational, civic and humanitarian projects world wide.

Philanthropy
8
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Rotary Club of Graham Texas

Grant to organizations or group to benefit the citizens of graham and young county

Public Benefit
10
Rotary Club of Oakley Foundation

Provide scholarships and other educational expenses to local schools and provide monetary assistance to the local community in general as necessary to improve the community and to other projects worldwide.

Human Services
11
Rotary Club of Valley Center

To provide community service & scholarships to local youth

12
Sanger Rotary Foundation

Support charitable need within the greater Sanger community.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary International and the most unlike its peers is Casa Grande Rotary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fort Yuma Rotary Club Inc — $40,200 · OtherFort Yuma Rotary Club IncROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $23,580 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALYuma Rotary Club — $19,360 · OtherYuma Rotary ClubROTARY CLUB OLD PUEBLO CLUB — $13,776 · OtherROTARY CLUB OLD PUEBLO CLUBROTARY INTERNATIONAL YUMA FOOTHILLS ROTARY — $12,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL YUMA FOOTHILLS ROTARYCATALINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · OtherCATALINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INCROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $11,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $10,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF TUCSON SUNRISE — $8,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $7,200 · Other+12 more — $54,754 · Other+12 moreSIERRA VISTA ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES — $8,550 · PhilanthropyTubac Rotary Club Foundation — $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA GRANDE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationSaddlebrooke Sunrise Rotary Club Fo — $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$212,370Philanthropy$8,550Youth Development$8,000Education$6,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFort Yuma Rotary Club Inc — $40,200 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $23,580 over 4y, 11% of budgetYuma Rotary Club — $19,360 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL YUMA FOOTHILLS ROTARY — $12,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetCATALINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCASA GRANDE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRincon Rotary Club Foundation — $5,360 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF GREEN VALLEY — $3,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fort Yuma Rotary Club Inc
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Yuma Rotary Club
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL YUMA FOOTHILLS ROTARY
  • Who funds CATALINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SIERRA VISTA ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES
  • Who funds Tubac Rotary Club Foundation
  • Who funds CASA GRANDE ROTARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Rincon Rotary Club Foundation
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF GREEN VALLEY
  • Who funds Saddlebrooke Sunrise Rotary Club Fo

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rotary International District 5500 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph