Skip to content
Rotary Club of El Campo Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rotary Club of El Campo Foundation

To offer assistance through grants and various charitable organizations.

$176k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$148kRecreation & Sports$110kHuman Services$110kYouth Development$93kFood & Nutrition$43kCommunity Improvement$27kEducation$25kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $105,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $176,488 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $71,488 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$55,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$53k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL CAMPO BOWLING CENTER$55,000
NORTHSIDE CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $78k → 15%HOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE: $10k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $60k → 15%EL CAMPO BOWLING CENTER: $55k → 15%EL CAMPO BOWLING CENTER: $55k → 15%NORTHSIDE CENTER: $50k → 15%PILGRIM REST ASAP PROGRAM: $50k → 15%NORTHSIDE CENTER: $50k → 15%EL CAMPO LITTLE LEAGUE: $43k → 15%BLESSING CUP STOREHOUSE: $43k → 15%ROTARY CLUB OF EL CAMPO: $27k → 15%MANNA MEALS: $20k → 15%EL CAMPO HIGH SCHOOL CNA PROGRAM: $10k → 15%WHARTON COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Campo Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

—
2
Rotary Club of El Campo Foundation

To offer assistance through grants and various charitable organizations.

Arts & Culture
3
Rotary Club of El Paso Foundation

Promote projects and initiatives that improve el paso , ciudad juarez, and las cruces region

Community Improvement
4
Rotary Club of Benicia Foundation

To support local education institutions and other charities.

Philanthropy
5
La Jolla Rotary Foundation

To revieve and administer funds for educational purposes, all for public welfare.

—
6
POST11AMERICAN Legion Jr Baseball

Provide facilities and equipment for recreational use by youth baseball

Youth Development
7
Little League Baseball Inc

Recreation - team sports - baseball

Recreation & Sports
8
Little League Baseball Llc 1140215 State Park Little League

Youth baseball

—
9
Woodland Hills Rotary Club Foundation

To provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill and peace

—
10
West Boca Youth Baseball Inc

The organization operates a baseball program for the youth in the community.

Recreation & Sports
11
Rotary Club of El Paso

The commitment of members to make a difference, dedication to serviceabove self in order to advance understanding, collaboration, goodwill,peace and fellowship in the interest of helping all while exercisingthe highest ethical standards.

—
12
Tolar Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department organized to contain fires in and around the city of tolar, county of hood, texas

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary Club of El Campo; the most unlike its peers is Little League Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL CAMPO BOWLING CENTER: $110,000 · OtherEL CAMPO BOWLING CENTEREL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $77,770 · OtherEL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATIONAFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM ASAP: $50,000 · OtherAFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM ASAPLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $43,000 · OtherLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INCBLESSING CUP STOREHOUSE INC: $43,000 · OtherBLESSING CUP STOREHOUSE INCROTARY CLUB OF EL CAMPO: $27,387 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF EL CAMPOWHARTON CO JR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherWHARTON CO JR COLLEGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthNORTHSIDE CENTER INCMATAGORDA COUNTY WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $60,000 · HealthMATAGORDA COUNTY WOMEN'S CRISIS …HOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE: $10,000 · HealthHOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACETHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,200 · International
Other$406,157Health$170,000International$8,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHSIDE CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetEL CAMPO MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $77,770 over 1y, 18% of budgetMATAGORDA COUNTY WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $60,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $43,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBLESSING CUP STOREHOUSE INC: $43,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF EL CAMPO: $27,387 over 1y, 17% of budgetWHARTON CO JR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetHOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary Club of El Campo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary Club of El Campo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary Club of El Campo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home