Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rose & Isadore Zeman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$27kPhilanthropy$22kReligion$20kEducation$20kCivil Rights$14kInternational$9kArts & Culture$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$225k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$2,500
THE JEFFREY BERGER FOUNDATION$1,500
HANNAH PERETSMAN BREENE FOUNDATION$1,500
HILLEL FOUNDATION$1,500
THE ZEMAN SCHOOL$1,400
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AM FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
UJAMETROWEST$500
JEWISH WAR VETERANS$500
RACHEL COALITION$500
CITY OF HOPE$500
SPECTRUM 360$500
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JCC MANHATTAN: $500 → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $500 → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $500 → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 28 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$145k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-4%

Still filing today

25%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    The Hannah Peretsman Breene Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +42%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • American Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -4%
  • DO
    Daughters of Israel Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue -47%
  • RM
    R MARLIN HOLOCAUST EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
7
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
8
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
9
The Jerusalem Connection
—
10
American Jewish University

American jewish university (aju) advances and elevates the jewish journey of individuals, organizations and our community through excellence in scholarship, teaching, engaged conversation, and outreach. aju is a thriving center of jewish…

Education
11
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
12
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEFFREY BERGER FOUNDATION: $11,500 · OtherTHE JEFFREY BERGER FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODAM FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID: $6,500 · OtherAM FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVIDJEWISH WAR VETERANS: $6,250 · OtherJEWISH WAR VETERANSLIONS CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 · OtherLIONS CLUB INTERNATIONALTHE ZEMAN SCHOOL: $5,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherRACHEL COALITION: $4,500 · OtherMAYO PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $4,500 · OtherCITY OF HOPE: $4,500 · OtherUJAMETROWEST: $4,500 · OtherDEBORAH HOSPITAL: $4,500 · OtherTHIRTEEN: $4,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AM: $3,750 · Other+5 more: $9,250 · Other+5 moreBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $14,800 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIV…SPECTRUM360: $4,750 · EducationSPECTRUM360The Hannah Peretsman Breene Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $8,000 · ReligionSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $500 · HealthDaughters of Israel Inc: $250 · HealthCentral Fund of Israel: $3,000 · InternationalTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$109,350Education$19,550Philanthropy$10,000Religion$8,000Arts & Culture$6,000Health$3,250International$3,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $14,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hannah Peretsman Breene Foundation: $10,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPECTRUM360: $4,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDaughters of Israel Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Hannah Peretsman Breene Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM360 ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds Daughters of Israel Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rose & Isadore Zeman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rose & Isadore Zeman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rose & Isadore Zeman’s filings →

More from the funding graph