Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ronold L Von Hagen Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$265kEducation$220kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$642k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA FOUNDATION$32,000
COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP$13,000
BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM$13,000
SELZNICK EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SPORTS$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE MAY-TREANOR OHANA FOUNDATION$5,000
DIG FOR KIDS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DIG MISSOULA: $5k → 9%COLDSAND BEACH VOLLEYBALL: $3k → 18%THE OLYMPIC VALLEY FREESTYLE &: $6k → 6%THE MAY-TREANOR OHANA FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $15k → 12%SANTA MONICA COLLEGE: $3k → 14%USA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%DIG MISSOULA: $3k → 9%THE OLYMPIC VALLEY FREESTYLE &: $5k → 6%THE MAY-TREANOR OHANA FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $13k → 12%SANTA MONICA COLLEGE: $2k → 14%DIG MISSOULA: $2k → 9%THE OLYMPIC VALLEY FREESTYLE &: $5k → 6%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $13k → 12%DIG FOR KIDS: $3k → 14%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $12k → 12%DIG FOR KIDS: $2k → 14%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $12k → 12%UCLA FOUNDATION: $48k → 14%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $10k → 12%UCLA ATHLETIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT: $39k → 14%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $7k → 12%UCLA FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $5k → 12%UCLA FOUNDATION: $32k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%UCLA ATHLETICS DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 14%BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $6k → 14%SELZNICK EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SPORTS: $6k → 14%SELZNICK EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SPORTS: $5k → 14%BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $27k → 14%BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $23k → 14%BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $13k → 14%BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $12k → 14%BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $10k → 14%BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$240k · 8 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2428% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$240k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2428%
+27%

Still filing today

25%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue +89%
  • CV
    COACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $87k
  • TO
    THE OLYMPIC VALLEY FREESTYLE &
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k

Funded once

  • UA
    UCLA ATHLETIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT
    one grant, 2019 · $39k
  • UV
    USA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA FOUNDATION: $214,588 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONCOACHING VOLLEYBALL CORP: $86,500 · OtherCOACHING VOLLEYBALL CORPUCLA ATHLETIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT: $39,104 · OtherUCLA ATHLETIC DEVELOPMENT DEPTTHE OLYMPIC VALLEY FREESTYLE &: $16,000 · OtherTHE OLYMPIC VALLEY FREESTYLE &SELZNICK EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SPORTS: $11,000 · OtherSELZNICK EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SPORTSDIG MISSOULA: $10,000 · OtherDIG MISSOULAMAY-TREANOR OHANA FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Other+3 more: $13,000 · Other+3 moreBEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $98,000 · Recreation & SportsBEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOMDIG FOR KIDS: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$214,588Other$183,604Recreation & Sports$106,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $214,588 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM: $98,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetDIG FOR KIDS: $5,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetUSA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPSCOM ↗
  • Who funds DIG FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds USA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronold L Von Hagen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronold L Von Hagen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ronold L Von Hagen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph