Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ronald and Barbara Brunner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$519kReligion$118kFood & Nutrition$64kHousing & Shelter$54kAnimals$40kPublic Benefit$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kScience & Tech$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mauston Area Ambulance Assn Inc$10,000
St Paul's Catholic Church$10,000
Carl W Nelson Animal Shelter$5,000
ST THERESA EUCHARISTIC CHAPEL$5,000
CROOK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
WESTON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,000
COMMUNITY SHARING PANTRY$2,500
Royall School District$2,000
MAUSTON HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%COMMUNITY SHARING PANTRY: $10k → 14%TOYS FOR JOY: $5k → 14%TOYS FOR JOY: $5k → 14%TOYS FOR JOY: $5k → 14%TOYS FOR JOY: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY SHARING PANTRY: $3k → 14%COMMUNITY SHARING PANTRY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 12 repeat orgs$753k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
24

Total granted

$303k
$730k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+27%

Still filing today

42%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PATRICK'S PARISH MAUSTON
    3× · 2022–2024 · $71k
  • OR
    OPERATION RENEWED HOPE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $54k · revenue -5%
  • CN
    CARL NELSON ANIMAL SHELTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • WC
    Weston County Health
    one grant, 2024 · $500k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neillsville Area Food Pantry Inc

Emergency Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
2
Guernsey Community Food Pantry

To eliminate hunger in the guernsey community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Society of St Vincent De Paul of Waukesha County Inc

Assisting those in need in our area

Human Services
4
Bismarck Emergency Food Pantry Inc

Provide food to people in need

—
5
Northern Stokes Food Pantry Inc

To prevent hunger for persons located in northern stokes county

Food & Nutrition
6
Good Samaritan Outreach Center

Providing food, clothing, and household goods to needy families in milwaukee county

Food & Nutrition
7
Shepherds Pantry Inc

Providing free food to needy New Hampshire residents.

Human Services
8
Long Prairie Emergency Food Pantry

Furnish needy famililes food

—
9
Grace Now of Madison County Inc

purchase food and supplies

Human Services
10
Burlington-Hampshire Area Food Pantry

Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
11
Barron Area Clergy Assoc Inc

Giving food & supplies

Human Services
12
North Scott Food Pantry

The North Scott Food Pantry provides food for people in need. Clients receive enough food for about one week and are allowed to get food every 28 days. There were 721 visits to our food pantry in 2025.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Sharing Pantry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Weston County Health: $500,000 · OtherWeston County HealthST PATRICK'S PARISH MAUSTON: $71,000 · OtherST PATRICK'S PARISH MAUSTONIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN LEGION: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherNASA: $30,000 · Other+26 more: $173,271 · Other+26 moreOPERATION RENEWED HOPE FOUNDATION: $53,700 · Housing & ShelterCARL NELSON ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $40,000 · AnimalsTOYS FOR JOY: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SHARING PANTRY INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesGABRIEL PROJECT OF WYOMING INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesMAUSTON AREA AMBULANCE ASSN INC: $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 · HealthNEW LISBON FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSUNDANCE RODEO CLUB INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsGOOD SAMARITAN HILLSBORO INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$894,271Housing & Shelter$53,700Animals$40,000Human Services$37,000Health$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Recreation & Sports$4,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION RENEWED HOPE FOUNDATION: $53,700 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCARL NELSON ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $40,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetTOYS FOR JOY: $20,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHARING PANTRY INC: $14,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetMAUSTON AREA AMBULANCE ASSN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW LISBON FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNDANCE RODEO CLUB INC: $4,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetGABRIEL PROJECT OF WYOMING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWISCONSIN STATE COUNCIL KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION RENEWED HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARL NELSON ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TOYS FOR JOY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SHARING PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAUSTON AREA AMBULANCE ASSN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LISBON FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds SUNDANCE RODEO CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GABRIEL PROJECT OF WYOMING INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HILLSBORO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern WiWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern Wi · Land O'Lakes Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronald and Barbara Brunner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronald and Barbara Brunner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ronald and Barbara Brunner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ronald and Barbara Brunner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ronald and Barbara Brunner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph