Skip to content
Rockville Economic Development Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rockville Economic Development Inc

To identify and develop economic opportunities to help rockville prosper.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$2.8MHealth$112kHousing & Shelter$102kReligion$40kScience & Tech$21kEmployment$20k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $193,016, the rows itemized in this filing. The $218,818 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,802 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
$7,548
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PODVILLE MEDIA$40,000
MONTGOMERY COUNTY GREEN BANK CORPORATION$25,520
THE TOT SPACE$15,440
NEXT LEVEL RENTALS & REALTY$15,000
THE CENTER FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES$13,600
JULIAN SISMAN DBA PREPARE FOR PERFORMANCE$12,500
GOWDA INFORMATICS AUTOMATION AND TECHNOLOGIES LLC$9,548
THE DONALDSON GROUP LLC$7,548
UNLIMITED DETAILING$7,500
NATURE BY TREJOK$7,500
WALKING LIBERTY LLC$7,500
WANI DESIGNS LLC$7,500
DECIPHER EVENTS LLC$7,500
FLOOD LAW LLC$5,640
LADY VINTER$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%INTERFAITH WORKS INC: $40k → 8%AUTONOMOUS THERAPEUTICS INC: $36k → 8%SMATHERS AND BRANSON: $35k → 8%ROCKVILLE PHYSICAL THERAPY: $20k → 8%TWINBROOK DENTAL: $16k → 8%THE TOT SPACE: $15k → 8%BARNALLEN TECHNOLOGIES INC: $14k → 8%NEURO-VISION THERAPY CENTER LLC: $12k → 8%GOWDA INFORMATICS AUTOMATION AND TECHNOLOGIES LLC: $10k → 8%DAWSONS MARKET: $500k → 8%DM ROCKVILLE LLC DBA DAWSON'S MARKET: $400k → 8%DAWSONS MARKET: $400k → 8%DAWSONS MARKET: $300k → 8%DAWSONS MARKET: $300k → 8%DM ROCKVILLE LLC DBA DAWSON'S MARKET: $200k → 8%PODVILLE MEDIA: $40k → 8%MONTAGE MARKETING GROUP LLC: $35k → 8%COTTAGE MONET LLC: $34k → 8%COTTAGE MONET: $30k → 8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY GREEN BANK CORPORATION: $26k → 8%WALKING LIBERTY LLC: $25k → 8%NATURE BY TREJOK: $25k → 8%LAUNCH SP LLC: $25k → 8%INTEGRATED PHARMA SERVICES LLC: $22k → 8%CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY INC: $22k → 8%AVENDRA LLC: $20k → 8%TOTAL RECON AUTO CENTER: $20k → 8%WANI DESIGNS LLC: $20k → 8%INNOVATIVE CELLULAR THERAPEUTICS INC: $20k → 8%UNLIMITED DETAILING: $20k → 8%DRB ENTERPRISES LLC: $20k → 8%CHANEY COMMUNICATIONS: $20k → 8%DIA CORPORATION INC: $16k → 8%BEV-RAGE LLC: $16k → 8%CHANEY COMMUNICATIONS: $15k → 8%COTTAGE MONET LLC: $15k → 8%NEXT LEVEL RENTALS & REALTY: $15k → 8%NATURE BY TREJOK: $15k → 8%OMEGA 3 NUTRITION INC: $15k → 8%KIM ENGINEERING: $14k → 8%LURN INC: $14k → 8%THE CENTER FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES: $14k → 8%AFC URGENT CARE ROCKVILLE: $13k → 8%JULIAN SISMAN DBA PREPARE FOR PERFORMANCE: $13k → 8%NEXT LEVEL RENTALS LLC: $11k → 8%PREMIUM HOME HEALTH CARE LLC: $10k → 8%DECIPHER EVENTS LLC: $25k → 8%DECIPHER EVENTS LLC: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 12 repeat orgs$552k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$2.5M
$439k

Still filing today

0%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DAWSONS MARKET
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M
  • CM
    COTTAGE MONET LLC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $86k
  • DE
    DECIPHER EVENTS LLC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $57k

Funded once

  • IW
    INTERFAITH WORKSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +35%
  • AT
    Autonomous Therapeutics Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • SA
    SMATHERS AND BRANSON
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAWSONS MARKET: $2,100,000 · OtherDAWSONS MARKET+41 more: $903,620 · Other+41 moreINTERFAITH WORKS: $40,000 · ReligionMONTGOMERY COUNTY GREEN BANK CORPORATION: $25,520 · EnvironmentPEERLESS ROCKVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION LTD: $8,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,003,620Religion$40,000Environment$25,520Arts & Culture$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERFAITH WORKS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY GREEN BANK CORPORATION: $25,520 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEERLESS ROCKVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION LTD: $8,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERFAITH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY GREEN BANK CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PEERLESS ROCKVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION LTD ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rockville Economic Development Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rockville Economic Development Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Interfaith Works: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rockville Economic Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home