· Public charity
Robonation Inc
Robonation delivers educational programs in robotics, autonomy, and related technologies through student competitions, hands-on learning resources, and educator support.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEPDAC INC | $15,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SCSEAFARER CHAPTER INCORPORATED AUVSI4× · 2018–2023 · $114k · revenue -91% · 57% of their budget
- SISEPDAC INC5× · 2018–2025 · $102k
- OUOakland University Foundation2× · 2018–2019 · $41k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- EAEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INCgraduated2× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +69%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAone grant, 2018 · $8k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Robonation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robonation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 3% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Robonation’s filings →