Skip to content
Roberta and Richard David Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Roberta and Richard David Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$31kArts & Culture$24kPhilanthropy$13kEducation$11kHuman Services$5kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL$10,000
THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER$8,300
Individual grant recipient$5,000
STAND WITH US$5,000
OUTREACH PROJECT$5,000
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND - GLEN OAKS PHILNTHROPIC FUND$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NANTUCKET INTERFAITH COUNCIL DBA NANTUCKET FOOD FUEL RENTAL ASSISTANCE: $3k → 6%STAND WITH US: $5k → 14%MANHASSET FIRE DEPARTMENT: $500 → 6%LIFES WORK: $2k → 7%LAURENCE POLATSCH MEMORIAL FUND: $3k → 9%OUTREACH PROJECT: $5k → 13%UFA FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%KATE AND JOSTER RAE FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%MONTESSOR COMM SCHOOL: $3k → 14%ERIC FELTMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 6%HUNTINGTON FINE ARTS: $1k → 7%UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK: $4k → 17%MLT FOUNDATON: $3k → 6%UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK: $3k → 17%NORTHWELL HEALTH - COHENS CHILDRENS MEDICAL: $1k → 6%UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK: $2k → 17%SHABAD OF BROOKVILLE: $5k → 6%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND - GLEN OAKS PHILNTHROPIC FUND: $2k → 17%NORTHWELL HEALTH - COHENS CHILDRENS MEDICAL: $500 → 6%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND - GLEN OAKS PHILNTHROPIC FUND: $1k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1k → 6%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND - GLEN OAKS PHILNTHROPIC FUND: $1k → 17%A LASTING MARK: $500 → 6%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND - GLEN OAKS PHILNTHROPIC FUND: $1k → 17%FAMILY CENTER FOR AUTISM: $1k → 6%THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER: $8k → 17%ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $10k → 6%THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER: $5k → 17%ST FRANCIS HOSPTAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER: $3k → 17%THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER: $3k → 17%THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER: $3k → 17%THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Roberta and Richard David Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Roberta and Richard David Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33k · 3 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$33k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+46%

Still filing today

33%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $23k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +5%
  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH - COHENS CHILDRENS MEDICAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k

Funded once

  • UF
    UFA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +46%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
5
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
6
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
7
St Francis Research & Educational Corporation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
8
Beth Israel Medical Center

Since its founding, over 120 years ago, as a medical dispensary to meet the needs of the impoverished and underserved jewish community of the lower east side, beth israel medical center has been committed to the care of persons of all…

Health
9
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
10
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
11
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
12
Plainview Hospital

Plainview hospital is part of northwell health, inc ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eric Feltman Memorial Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTER: $23,300 · OtherTHE HINENIN HERITAGE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUFA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherUFA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherLAURENCE POLATSCH MEMORIAL FUND: $2,500 · OtherNANTUCKET INTERFAITH COUNCIL DBA NANTUCKET FOOD FUEL RENTAL ASSISTANCE: $2,500 · OtherMONTESSOR COMM SCHOOL: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+6 more: $5,500 · Other+6 moreST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $10,000 · HealthST FRANCIS HOSPITALST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUND…OUTREACH PROJECT INC: $5,000 · HealthOUTREACH PROJECT INCTHE FAMILY CENTER FOR ACHIEVEMENT CO LIFE'S WORC: $1,000 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH A…JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $4,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $5,000 · InternationalERIC FELTMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$50,800Health$21,000Philanthropy$12,500International$5,000Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetERIC FELTMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER FOR ACHIEVEMENT CO LIFE'S WORC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds ERIC FELTMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY CENTER FOR ACHIEVEMENT CO LIFE'S WORC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roberta and Richard David Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roberta and Richard David Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roberta and Richard David Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home