Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Oregon · Public charity

Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006

Trust income is to be distributed to the oregon community foundation for its administration under an advised fund named "bob and phyllis mace watchable wildlife fund".

$316k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2024
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Oregon Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2024
$252,536
Largest grant, FY2024
$252,536
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$382k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Watchable Wildlife Foundation Inc$63,615168%

Compare Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006 with peer funders

About Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006

How much does Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006 give?
Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006 reported 2 grants totaling $316,151 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (80%), Environment (20%).
Who are Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Watchable Wildlife Foundation Inc ($64k).
Where is Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006 based?
Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006 is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert U Mace Test Tr Uw Dtd June 12 2006’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home