Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert L Howell Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$122k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$535kYouth Development$56kPhilanthropy$53kFood & Nutrition$42kArts & Culture$35kRecreation & Sports$35kHuman Services$21kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k16 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pillow Academy$50,000
Mayo Foundation$20,000
United Way$7,500
MS Delta Comm College$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Greenwood Leflore Fuller for Housing$5,000
GWD Youth Soccer$5,000
GWD Exchange Club$5,000
Museum of the Delta$3,500
Salvation Army$3,000
Greenwood Leflore Public Libary$3,000
Humane Society of Leflore Co$2,500
GWD Interfaith Ministries$2,000
Girls & Boys Club of Leflore Co$2,000
Greenwood Little Theater$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 30%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MS DELTA COMM COLLEGE: $5k → 32%PILLOW ACADEMY: $50k → 34%Mayo Foundation: $20k → 14%MS DELTA COMM COLLEGE: $5k → 32%PILLOW ACADEMY: $50k → 34%MAYO FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MS DELTA COMM COLLEGE: $5k → 32%Pillow Academy: $50k → 34%MAYO FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MS DELTA COMM COLLEGE: $5k → 32%PILLOW ACADEMY: $50k → 34%MAYO FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MS Delta Comm College: $5k → 32%PILLOW ACADEMY: $50k → 34%MAYO FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MS DELTA COMM COLLEGE: $5k → 32%PILLOW ACADEMY: $50k → 34%MAYO FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MS DELTA COMM COLLEGE: $5k → 32%PILLOW ACADEMY: $50k → 34%SCHOLARSHIPS: $11k → 34%SCHOLARSHIPS: $10k → 34%SCHOLARSHIPS: $10k → 34%UNITED WAY: $8k → 34%UNITED WAY: $8k → 34%UNITED WAY: $8k → 34%UNITED WAY: $8k → 34%SCHOLARSHIPS: $8k → 34%UNITED WAY: $8k → 34%SCHOLARSHIPS: $8k → 34%United Way: $8k → 34%UNITED WAY: $8k → 34%GWD Youth Soccer: $5k → 34%GWD YOUTH SOCCER: $5k → 34%GWD YOUTH SOCCER: $5k → 34%GWD YOUTH SOCCER: $5k → 34%GWD YOUTH SOCCER: $5k → 34%Scholarships: $5k → 34%GWD YOUTH SOCCER: $5k → 34%SCHOLARSHIPS: $5k → 34%GWD YOUTH SOCCER: $5k → 34%MUSEUM OF THE DELTA: $4k → 34%Museum of the Delta: $4k → 34%MUSEUM OF THE DELTA: $4k → 34%MUSEUM OF THE DELTA: $4k → 34%MUSEUM OF THE DELTA: $4k → 34%MUSEUM OF THE DELTA: $4k → 34%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$860k · 18 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$860k
$16k

Still filing today

22%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    Greenwood Leflore Educational Foundation Inc D/B/A Pillow Academy
    7× · 2017–2023 · $350k · revenue +9%
  • GI
    GREENWOOD INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
    6× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue +85%
  • GL
    GREENWOOD LITTLE THEATRE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • GL
    Greenwood Leflore Fuller for Housing
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • GL
    Greenwood Leflore Public Libary
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • HS
    Humane Society of Leflore Co
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $56,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY: $52,500 · OtherUNITED WAYGWD EXCHANGE CLUB: $35,000 · OtherGWD EXCHANGE CLUBGWD YOUTH SOCCER: $35,000 · OtherGWD YOUTH SOCCERMS Delta Comm College: $35,000 · OtherMS Delta Comm CollegeGREENWOOD LEFLORE FULLER FOR HOUSIN: $30,000 · OtherGREENWOOD LEFLORE FULLER FOR HOUSINMUSEUM OF THE DELTA: $24,500 · OtherSalvation Army: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · Other+12 more: $57,000 · Other+12 moreGreenwood Leflore Educational Foundation Inc D/B/A Pillow Academy: $350,000 · EducationGreenwood Leflore Educational Foundation Inc …GREENWOOD INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $12,000 · Human ServicesGREENWOOD LITTLE THEATRE: $9,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$504,250Education$350,000Human Services$12,000Arts & Culture$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreenwood Leflore Educational Foundation Inc D/B/A Pillow Academy: $350,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGREENWOOD INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $12,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetGREENWOOD LITTLE THEATRE: $9,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Greenwood Leflore Educational Foundation Inc D/B/A Pillow Academy ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD LITTLE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC 558 CHICKASAW COUNCIL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert L Howell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert L Howell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert L Howell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert L Howell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert L Howell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph