Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert L & Joan Bramson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$39kInternational$19kFood & Nutrition$7kReligion$5kEducation$3kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Save a Child's Heart$2,500
Gateways and Access to Jewish Education$2,500
American Friends of Leket Israel$2,400
The Trevor Project$2,000
Chai Life Line Inc$1,800
US Friends of Dror Israel$1,800
Hadassah$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISrael Special Kids Fund: $3k → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $3k → 17%ISrael Special Kids Fund: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$80k · 9 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$80k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+23%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +111%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +43%
  • IS
    ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND
    3× · 2020–2022 · $8k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +14%
  • WC
    Women's Center of Greater Lansing
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
2
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

3
Partners Charity Fund for Israel

To support charitable organization and programs providing food, clothing and financial aid to indigent individuals and families in financial distress.

Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Hakav Hameached Inc

To help and support children with rare sybfromes and disorders and their families. to help and support children victimized and traumatized by terror attacks and thier families.

International
5
Sherit Isroel
6
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
7
Israel Select Charity Fund Inc

Helping individuals and organizations with great needs and little resources and with often few options.

Human Services
8
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
9
Humanitarian Partnership for Israel

Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Tzohar

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

11
Larger Than Life Usa Inc

Larger than life usa inc is a non profit organization, operating in the usa for the benefit of israeli children afflicted with cancer

Human Services
12
American Friends of Kishorit Inc

American support organization for Kishorit, a community for people with disabilities in Israel.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Leket Israel Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women's Center of Greater Lansing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC — $15,601 · OtherSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INCGateways — $13,101 · OtherGatewaysHadassah — $5,400 · OtherHadassahUS FRIENDS OF DROR ISRAEL INC — $3,100 · OtherUS FRIENDS OF DROR ISRAEL INCGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $2,600 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCGateways and Access to Jewish Education — $2,500 · OtherGateways and Access to Jewish Education+1 more — $1,200 · OtherCHAI LIFELINE INC — $13,801 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INCISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $10,501 · HealthISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDAT…ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND — $8,001 · Human ServicesISRAEL SPE…TREVOR PROJECT INC — $6,300 · Civil RightsAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $4,400 · Philanthropy
Other$43,502Health$24,302Human Services$8,001Civil Rights$6,300Philanthropy$4,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC — $15,601 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $13,801 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $10,501 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND — $8,001 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $6,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $4,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUS FRIENDS OF DROR ISRAEL INC — $3,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Center of Greater Lansing — $1,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert L & Joan Bramson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph