Skip to content
Robert J Greene Irrev Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Robert J Greene Irrev Trust

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$475k
Granted FY2018
5
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$658kEducation$235kAnimals$47k
02FY2018 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $119k
  • $250k+1 grant · $285k
$23,756
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$285,064
DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL$118,777
SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORP$23,756
SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTER$23,755
RUTLAND AREA VISITING NURSES ASSOC & HOSPICE$23,755
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTER: $24k → 11%RUTLAND AREA VISITING NURSES ASSOC & HOSPICE: $24k → 12%DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL: $119k → 10%SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTER: $23k → 11%RUTLAND AREA VISITING NURSES ASSOC & HOSPICE: $23k → 12%DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL: $116k → 10%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORP: $24k → 11%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORP: $23k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 5 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $564,243 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $47,021 · HealthSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATIONTrustees of Dartmouth College: $235,102 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth Colleg…SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTER: $47,020 · OtherSECOND CHAN…RUTLAND AREA VISITING NURSES ASSOC & HOSPICE: $47,020 · OtherRUTLAND ARE…
Health$611,264Education$235,102Other$94,040

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $564,243 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $235,102 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $47,021 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert J Greene Irrev Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert J Greene Irrev Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert J Greene Irrev’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home