Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Craft Igor Stravinsky Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$2.1MArts & Culture$171kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD$280,000
THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL$55,000
MEANY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$25,000
THE WASHINGTON BALLET$10,000
DINOSAURANN$5,000
LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NY$5,000
BOSTON MODERN ORCHESTRA PROJECT$5,000
NEW EAR CONTEMPORARY CHAMBER$5,000
PS21 PERFORMANCE SPACES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY$5,000
NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 47% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 53% that went abroad ($1.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOSTON MODERN ORCHESTRA PROJECT: $5k → 8%Bard College Conservatory of Music: $4k → 9%PS21 PERFORMANCE SPACES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: $5k → 11%AMERICANS FOR OXFORD: $280k → 17%THE WASHINGTON BALLET: $10k → 14%DINOSAURANN: $5k → 11%NEWEAR CONTEMPORARY MUSIC ENSEMBLE: $10k → 15%MEANY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $25k → 9%Musica Aperta: $5k → 8%PS21 PERFORMANCE SPACES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: $5k → 11%AMERICANS FOR OXFORD: $200k → 17%THE WASHINGTON BALLET: $10k → 14%DINOSAURANN: $5k → 11%NEW EAR CONTEMPORARY CHAMBER: $10k → 15%MEANY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10k → 9%PS21 Performance Spaces for the 21st Century: $5k → 11%Americans for Oxford: $140k → 17%The Washington Ballet: $5k → 14%NEW EAR CONTEMPORARY CHAMBER: $5k → 15%PS21 Performance Spaces for the 21st Century: $5k → 11%Americans for Oxford: $100k → 17%NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY: $10k → 17%NY YOUTH SYMPHONY: $5k → 17%NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY: $5k → 17%THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $55k → 17%THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $55k → 17%The Juilliard School: $50k → 17%The Juilliard School: $25k → 17%LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NY: $10k → 17%LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NY: $5k → 17%LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NY: $5k → 17%LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NY: $5k → 17%Washington Square Contemporary Music Society: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 53% of all-years giving ($1.2M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$1.2M · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.3M

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $720k · revenue +21%
  • JS
    JUILLIARD SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $185k · revenue +28%
  • TL
    THE LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
    one grant, 2021 · $1.2M
  • NC
    NEWEAR CONTEMPORARY MUSIC ENSEMBLE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • WS
    WASHINGTON SQUARE CONTEMPORARY MUSIC SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD: $1,234,715 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD+10 more: $121,140 · Other+10 moreAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $720,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INCJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $185,000 · EducationJUILLIARD SCHOOLTHE WASHINGTON BALLET: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON MODERN ORCHESTRA PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,355,855Education$905,000Arts & Culture$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $720,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $185,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON BALLET: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBOSTON MODERN ORCHESTRA PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON BALLET ↗
  • Who funds THE LYRIC CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MODERN ORCHESTRA PROJECT INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Craft Igor Stravinsky Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Craft Igor Stravinsky Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Boston Modern Orchestra Project Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert Craft Igor Stravinsky Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert Craft Igor Stravinsky Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert Craft Igor Stravinsky’s filings →

More from the funding graph