Skip to content

· Public charity

Right From the Start Nutrition Inc

The organization is an approved sponsor under the usdas child and adult care food program (cacfp).

$4.2M
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Food & Nutrition$11MHuman Services$3.2MEducation$78kReligion$30k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $2,951,533, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,242,289 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,290,756 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$2,951,533
Median grant
1
States reached
$645k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMAZING BEGINNING CHILD CARE CENTER$2,951,533
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMUNIDAD CHILD CARE CENTER: $24k → 14%COMUNIDAD CHILD CARE CENTER: $18k → 14%COMUNIDAD CHILD CARE CENTER: $18k → 14%COMUNIDAD CHILD CARE CENTER: $16k → 14%COMUNIDAD CHILD CARE CENTER: $13k → 14%TOTS HAVEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $17k → 11%TOTS HAVEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $17k → 11%TOTS HAVEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $16k → 11%TOTS HAVEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $12k → 11%TOTS HAVEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 73 repeat orgs$428k to everyone else

73 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 72 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
21

Total granted

$14M
$428k

Still filing today

3%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    AMAZING BEGINNING CHILD CARE CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $3.1M
  • MC
    MAGICLAND CHILD CARE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $509k
  • FA
    FAITH ACADEMY CHILD CARE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $409k

Funded once

  • SK
    STAR KIDDOS DAYCARE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • BL
    BETTY LIN EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
    one grant, 2017 · $54k
  • YE
    YOUNG EXPRESSIONS CHILD CARE
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMAZING BEGINNING CHILD CARE CENTER: $3,095,228 · OtherAMAZING BEGINNING CHILD CARE CENTERMAGICLAND CHILD CARE: $509,162 · Other+90 more: $10,904,940 · Other+90 moreCOMUNIDAD CHILD CARE CENTER: $88,863 · Human ServicesTOT S HAVEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $72,281 · Human Services
Other$14,509,330Human Services$161,144

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMUNIDAD CHILD CARE CENTER: $88,863 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetTOT S HAVEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $72,281 over 5y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Right From the Start Nutrition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Right From the Start Nutrition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Right From the Start Nutrition Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Right From the Start Nutrition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $4.8M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Right From the Start Nutrition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph