Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard a Zappala Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$331k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$648kEducation$335kHealth$306kYouth Development$155kReligion$152kPhilanthropy$140kHuman Services$105kArts & Culture$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSBURGH BOTANIC GARDEN$67,000
LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY$50,000
CHRIST CHURCH CAPITOL HILL$35,000
ADDICTION RECOVERY MINISTRY CO STFRANCIS OF ASSISI$30,000
AMD3 FOUNDATION$25,000
PROJECT LIFT$15,000
UNITED WAY OF MARTIN COUNTY$15,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC MARTIN HEALTH$11,500
FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY$10,000
KANE CENTERCOUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY$5,000
CHRIST THE KING PARISH$5,000
BIG BROTHERS & SISTERS OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$5,000
TYKES & TEENS$5,000
DC FAMILY YOUTH INITIATIVES$5,000
HOUSE OF HOPE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $1k → 14%FOX FAMILIES CARE: $3k → 11%FOX FAMILIES CARE: $1k → 11%FOX FAMILIES CARE: $1k → 11%FOX FAMILIES CARE: $1k → 11%ST LUCY AUXILIARY TO THE BLIND: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 44 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
18

Total granted

$1.8M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-11%

Still filing today

57%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    Pittsburgh Botanic Garden
    9× · 2017–2025 · $595k · revenue +116%
  • PL
    PROJECT LIFT INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +456%
  • AF
    AMD3 FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $67k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE ELLIS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +23%
  • SO
    SISTERS OF DIVINE PROVIDENCE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
5
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
6
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
7
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
12
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tokas Friends. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
21/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pittsburgh Botanic Garden: $594,750 · Youth DevelopmentPittsburgh Botanic GardenPROJECT LIFT INC: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT LIFT INC+2 more: $23,250 · Youth DevelopmentADDICTION RECOVERY MINISTRY CO STFRANCIS OF ASSISI: $74,000 · OtherADDICTION RECOVERY MINISTRY CO S…CLEVELAND CLINIC MARTIN HEALTH: $54,500 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC MARTIN HEALTHCHRIST CHURCH WASHINGTON PARISH: $50,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH WASHINGTON PARISHBIG BROTHERS & SISTERS OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $35,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS & SISTERS OF GREATE…ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCHCHRIST CHURCH CAPITOL HILL: $35,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH CAPITOL HILLKANE CENTERCOUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY: $25,000 · OtherMARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherHIBISCUS CHILDRENS CENTER: $20,500 · OtherCENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION: $20,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPE: $20,000 · OtherPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $23,000 · Other+28 more: $146,250 · Other+28 moreLA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $225,000 · EducationLA ROCHE UNIVERSITYUCLA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $21,000 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD AC…THE ELLIS SCHOOL: $17,000 · EducationSAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC: $13,600 · Education+2 more: $16,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC: $135,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMD3 FOUNDATION: $67,000 · HealthTYKES & TEENS INC: $20,000 · HealthMartin Memorial Foundation Inc: $20,000 · HealthST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Health+3 more: $8,500 · HealthFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $52,000 · Science & TechMARY'S SHELTER OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterSISTERS PLACE INC: $16,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,250 · Housing & Shelter
Youth Development$688,000Other$560,750Education$342,600Philanthropy$141,000Health$123,000Science & Tech$52,000Housing & Shelter$47,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPittsburgh Botanic Garden: $594,750 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetLA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $225,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC: $135,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT LIFT INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAMD3 FOUNDATION: $67,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $52,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S SHELTER OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $30,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $23,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTYKES & TEENS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ELLIS SCHOOL: $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY: $16,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERS PLACE INC: $16,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC: $13,600 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE CONNECTIONS INC: $10,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LYRIC INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MENTORING PARTNERSHIP OF SW PA: $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFox Families Care: $5,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LUCY'S AUXILIARY TO THE BLIND: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pittsburgh Botanic Garden ↗
  • Who funds LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMD3 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S SHELTER OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION ↗
  • Who funds TYKES & TEENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Martin Memorial Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ELLIS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LYRIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARGARET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MENTORING PARTNERSHIP OF SW PA ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family FoundationsPA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Burke Foundation · The Burke Family Foundation · The Fine Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43 · Eqt Foundation · Mathieson Family Foundation · The Simpson Family Foundation U/A Dtd 10/19/1999 · The Rust Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard a Zappala Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard a Zappala Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • United Way of Martin County Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Martin County: 2% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard a Zappala Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph