Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard a Winnestaffer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$25kReligion$24kFood & Nutrition$21kInternational$9kEnvironment$5kEducation$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$283k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLYING HORSE FARMS$7,500
SLEEPING DOGS LAW ENFORCEMENT MC$1,100
GAHANNA JEFFERSON EDUCATION FOUNDAT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MENTAL HEALTH ASSN OF NYC: $500 → 17%AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%UNITED WORLD MISSION: $2k → 10%FLYING HORSE FARMS: $8k → 11%CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $2k → 15%SLEEPING DOGS LAW ENFORCEMENT MC: $1k → 15%OPERATION SMILE: $2k → 10%SMILE TRAIN INC: $1k → 17%UNITED WORLD MISSION: $2k → 10%FLYING HORSE FARMS: $1k → 11%PELATONIA: $100 → 15%SMILE TRAIN INC: $500 → 17%UNITED WORLD MISSION: $2k → 10%ARTHUR G JAMES CANCER CENTER: $5k → 15%UNITED WORLD MISSION: $400 → 10%MELISSA'S HOUSE: $500 → 15%UNITED WORLD MISSION: $200 → 10%MELISSA'S HOUSE: $500 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA: $3k → 15%FREE TO SMILE FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%AMERICAN STROKE ASSOCIATION: $500 → 15%SHEPHERD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $14k → 15%SHEPHERD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $8k → 15%GAHANNA MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO: $3k → 15%ANGEL WORKS: $3k → 15%SHEPHERD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $2k → 15%SHEPNAZ BASKETBALL: $1k → 15%ANGEL WORKS: $1k → 15%GAHANNA JEFFERSON EDUCATION ASSOC: $800 → 15%SHEPNAZ BASKETBALL: $500 → 15%MID-OHIO FOOD BANK: $12k → 15%GAHANNA JEFFERSON EDUCATION FOUNDAT: $500 → 15%MID-OHIO FOOD BANK: $5k → 15%JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP: $10k → 15%US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL: $5k → 15%SHEPNAZ BASKETBALL: $500 → 15%MID-OHIO FOOD BANK: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 8 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$68k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+15%

Still filing today

38%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHEPHERD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $24k
  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    3× · 2020–2022 · $19k · revenue +5%
  • FH
    FLYING HORSE FARMS
    2× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue -4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • FT
    FREE TO SMILE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • UG
    US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance for Smiles International Inc

The mission of Alliance for Smiles, Inc (AfS) is to forever improve the lives of children and communities impacted by cleft and providing free comprehensive treatment, while building local capacity for long-term care. AFS does this by…

International
2
Oral Health International Foundation
—
3
Smile Bangladesh a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

Provide or secure free medical services to poor, distressed and under- prilileged children and adults in bangladesh and other underserved areas of the world in the form of cleft lip and palate surgeries as well as any related surgical,…

Health
4
Global Smile Foundation Inc

It is our goal to alleviate the suffering of underserved patients born with facial congenital deformities with special emphasis on cleft lips and palates. we believe all communities deserve the right to receive first rate care by highly…

International
5
Helen Keller International

Guided by her remarkable legacy of its co-founder, helen keller, helen keller intl partners with communities that are striving to overcome longstanding cycles of poverty. by delivering the essential building blocks of good health, sound…

International
6
Future Smiles

The mission of future smiles is to increase access to oral healthcare in underserved populations.

Health
7
Feed the Kids Columbus Inc

Feed The Kids Columbus strives to ensure food insecure children in Central Ohio have access to nutritious meals and snacks so they are able to learn and grow. There are as many as 12 million children in the United States who are at risk of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Feeding Children Everywhere Inc

Feeding children everywhere is committed to providing healthy meals to those in need. we are committed to sustainability. creating a hunger-free world will be possible if we have an awareness of our impact on the world around us. we have…

Food & Nutrition
9
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
10
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
11
Operation of Hope Worldwide

Operation of Hope is a medical foundation that provides primarily cleft lip, cleft palate, facial reconstructive and general reconstructive surgery to children in Latin America, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Egypt and Mongolia. We care for the needy…

International
12
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Flying Horse Farms; the most unlike its peers is Gahanna Jefferson Education Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHEPHERD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $24,420 · OtherSHEPHERD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENEMid-Ohio Foodbank: $19,250 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMESA GLOBAL: $7,800 · OtherMESA GLOBALUS GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL: $5,145 · OtherUS GREEN BUILDING COUNCILARTHUR G JAMES CANCER CENTER: $5,000 · OtherARTHUR G JAMES CANCER CENTERANGEL WORKS: $4,000 · OtherGAHANNA MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO: $3,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA: $3,000 · Other+9 more: $8,000 · Other+9 moreFLYING HORSE FARMS: $8,500 · Recreation & SportsFREE TO SMILE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · HealthThe Against Malaria Foundation: $1,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $1,800 · Food & NutritionOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,800 · International
Other$89,615Recreation & Sports$8,500Health$8,500Food & Nutrition$1,800International$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $19,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLYING HORSE FARMS: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREE TO SMILE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMELISSA'S HOUSE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGAHANNA JEFFERSON EDUCATION ASSOC: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO SMILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MELISSA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GAHANNA JEFFERSON EDUCATION ASSOC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard a Winnestaffer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard a Winnestaffer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard a Winnestaffer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard a Winnestaffer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard a Winnestaffer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph