Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Rhode Island Hospital’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Brown University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
4
18
5
19
4
20
3
21
2
22
1
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$7.9MHealth$1.1MHuman Services$531kPublic Benefit$292kEmployment$150kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $1,132,873 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,173,873 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $41,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$1,132,873
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brown University$1,132,873
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $531k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Inst Study & Prac Nonviolence: $156k → 14%Inst Study & Prac Nonviolence: $125k → 14%Inst Study & Prac Nonviolence: $125k → 14%Inst Study & Prac Nonviolence: $94k → 14%Inst Study & Prac Nonviolence: $31k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 5 repeat orgs$472k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +136% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$472k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+136%
+67%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rhode Island Hospital Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $825k · revenue +40%
  • NI
    NONVIOLENCE INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $531k · revenue +17%
  • THUNDERMIST HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $126k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • PS
    PROVIDENCE SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $292k
  • UR
    UNAP RIH EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · 52% of their budget
  • RI
    Rhode Island Metro EMS Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newport Hospital Foundation

NHF supports, encourages and coordinates the development of comprehensive, integrated health care-related services for the advancement and well-being of the community, in furtherance of the purposes of Newport Hospital (see Schedule O)

Health
2
Coastal Medical Physicians Inc Brown University Health Primary Care

CMPI was organized to provide accountable patient-centered, high quality, efficient, value-based and innovative care to serve the health needs of the communities in Rhode Island and elsewhere. (see Schedule O)

Health
3
Lifespan Corporation

Delivering health with care.

Health
4
Nhcc Medical Associates Inc

To support & encourage development of comprehensive, integrated health care services for the advancement and well-being of communities in Rhode Island and elsewhere, including those served by the hospitals affiliated with Brown Health.

5
The Miriam Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, TMH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
6
Lifespan Physician Group Inc Brown Health Medical Group

BHMG provides accountable patient-centered, high quality, efficient, value-based care to serve the health care needs of Rhode Islanders and others. BHMG's mission is: Delivering health with care.

Health
7
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
8
Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital

As a member hospital in the Brown University Health system, EPBH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
9
Brown Emergency Medicine Inc

To provide exceptional emergency medical care, education, research, and service to the people of rhode island and beyond.

Health
10
Pathways Inc

Pathways is organized for charitable purposes to provide physically and mentally impaired persons with low-income housing facilities and access to services which are specifically designed to meet their needs.

Human Services
11
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
12
Brown Urology Inc

The organization will provide health care services to the general public; support the residency programs, medical school and continuing medical education programs for students of the warren alpert medical school and at hospitals that are…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rhode Island Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Nonviolence Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROWN UNIVERSITY — $7,912,921 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITYRhode Island Hospital Foundation — $824,686 · HealthRhode Island…THUNDERMIST HEALTH CENTER — $125,625 · HealthTHUNDERMIST …Lifespan Foundation Brown University Health Foundation — $57,312 · HealthLifespan Fou…The Miriam Hospital Foundation — $43,000 · Health+2 more — $14,900 · HealthNONVIOLENCE INSTITUTE — $531,250 · Human ServicesPROVIDENCE SCHOOL DEPARTMENT — $292,000 · OtherUNAP RIH EDUCATION FUND — $150,000 · Other+2 more — $15,500 · Other
Community Improvement$7,912,921Health$1,065,523Human Services$531,250Other$457,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $7,912,921 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRhode Island Hospital Foundation — $824,686 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetNONVIOLENCE INSTITUTE — $531,250 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetUNAP RIH EDUCATION FUND — $150,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetTHUNDERMIST HEALTH CENTER — $125,625 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLifespan Foundation Brown University Health Foundation — $57,312 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetThe Miriam Hospital Foundation — $43,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGLORIA GEMMA BREAST CANCER RESOURCE FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBradley Hospital Foundation — $6,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Rhode Island Community FoundationRI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rhode Island Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph