Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reynolds Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$370k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$472kFood & Nutrition$376kHealth$283kHuman Services$276kCivil Rights$200kEducation$156kArts & Culture$142kPublic Safety & Disaster$87kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $352k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$40,000
SILOAM$35,000
TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION$35,000
MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER$25,000
BACKFIELD IN MOTION$25,000
LEARNING MATTERS$25,000
OASIS CENTER INC$25,000
PRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$20,000
MCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN$18,000
WO SMITH COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL$17,000
A STEP AHEAD MIDDLE TN$15,000
MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE$15,000
NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $8k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 24 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$2.0M
$3k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OASIS CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $192k · revenue +57%
  • MO
    MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $161k · revenue +153%
  • TI
    TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $136k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • M
    MUSICARES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
2
East Nashville Hope Exchange Inc

Enhance reading skills for at risk children

Education
3
Girls Write Nashville

Girls write nashville empowers expression through songwriting, production, mentorship and creative community for teen artists. we are an artist and educator-led 501(c)(3) creative youth development program in nashville, tn allied with…

Arts & Culture
4
Nashville Inner City Ministry Inc

Nashville inner city ministry is a christ-centered community organization dedicated to empowering the spiritual, educational and vocational development of at-risk youth and their families.

—
5
Nashville Freedom School Partnership

The Nashville Freedom School Partnership(C) uses literacy to instill cultural pride, self-assurance, and active citizenship with a primary focus on children of color.

Education
6
Nashville Public Media Inc

Nashville banner is a locally owned, community supported, civic news organization. we exist to empower the people of nashville to make informed decisions by providing non-partisan journalism from an independent, nonprofit newsroom. we are…

Arts & Culture
7
Opportunity Nashville

Opportunity nashville is an advocacy organization focused on improving educational equity in nashville. our mission is to ensure that every child in nashville has access to a high-quality public education.

—
8
Kings Academy Nashville

King's academy is a pre-k-8th grade independent christian school in nashville, tennessee, providing a classically inspired education to a racially and socioeconomically balanced student body.

Education
9
Episcopal School of Nashville

The episcopal school of nashville, a diverse urban independent school, is dedicated to nurturing the joy of learning and the spirit of discovery in each of its students.

Education
10
Needlink Nashville

Provide needy families and individuals with rent and utilities assistance in order to prevent their eviction or termination of utility services. also provide food and other assistance to needy families and individuals.

—
11
Purpose Preparatory Academy Inc

Through rigorous curriculum, high-quality instruction, and positive character development, purpose preparatory academy charter school ensures that all kindergarten through grade four students achieve the academic skills, knowledge, and…

—
12
Nashville Technology Council

Ntc mission is to advance the diverse technology ecosystem by connecting and promoting members, attracting, growing and retaining tech talent, and providing opportunities to reinvest in the greater nashville community.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bridges. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $194,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $157,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODSILOAM: $146,000 · OtherSILOAMAMERICAN RED CROSS: $87,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSMCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $73,000 · OtherMCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INCGIRLS ON THE RUN: $42,000 · OtherA STEP AHEAD MIDDLE TN: $42,000 · OtherMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $85,000 · OtherMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INCSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $63,500 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INCNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $36,000 · Other+6 more: $69,000 · Other+6 moreLEARNING MATTERS INC: $125,000 · EducationLEARNING MATTER…PRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES: $112,000 · EducationPRESTON TAYLOR …Book Em: $31,000 · EducationBook EmOASIS CENTER INC: $191,500 · Community ImprovementOASIS CENT…MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $161,000 · ReligionMARTHA O'…WO SMITH NASHVILLE COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $125,000 · Arts & CultureNASHVILLE BOOK CONNECTION: $14,000 · Arts & CultureTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION: $136,000 · Civil RightsBACKFIELD IN MOTION: $126,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$994,500Education$268,000Community Improvement$191,500Religion$161,000Arts & Culture$139,000Civil Rights$136,000Recreation & Sports$126,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOASIS CENTER INC: $191,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $161,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION: $136,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetBACKFIELD IN MOTION: $126,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetWO SMITH NASHVILLE COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $125,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetLEARNING MATTERS INC: $125,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetPRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES: $112,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $85,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetMCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $73,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $63,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $36,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBook Em: $31,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNASHVILLE BOOK CONNECTION: $14,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE CORPORATION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGES: $7,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OASIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds BACKFIELD IN MOTION ↗
  • Who funds WO SMITH NASHVILLE COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Book Em ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE BOOK CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Joe C Davis Foundation · Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · The Frist Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Junior League of Nashville Inc · Lifepoint Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reynolds Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reynolds Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reynolds Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph