Skip to content
Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2024still arriving
88
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$96kPhilanthropy$53kEducation$11kYouth Development$10kHealth$10kHuman Services$9kArts & Culture$7kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 88 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k87 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$501
Median grant
3
States reached
$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,156
YAD YOSEF$7,415
MISHKAN TORAH$7,289
Individual grant recipient$6,737
OHEL SIMHA SUPERFUND$4,326
Individual grant recipient$2,501
Individual grant recipient$2,320
MIDRASH ZION$1,810
A TIME USA$1,800
YAD MISHKAN$1,521
Individual grant recipient$1,502
SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY CENTER$1,500
CONG MAGEN DAVID OF WEST DEAL$1,204
ILAN HIGH SCHOOL INC$1,202
EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$1,201
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEEMAN FOUNDATION: $52 → 9%THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 11%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $585 → 20%LEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $501 → 20%LEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $501 → 20%AHAVA BABY INC: $300 → 20%OUR PLACE IN NY INC: $101 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $260 → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $201 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 56 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
104

Total granted

$128k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+19%

Still filing today

29%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KY
    KEREN YOM TOV INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +38%
  • MM
    MATTEH MOSHE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +6%
  • IH
    ILAN HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • JF
    JACKSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • OR
    OASIS RETREAT
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • MH
    Mekor Hayim Center Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
4
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
5
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
6
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
7
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
9
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Sherit Isroel
—
11
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
12
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ne'eman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 206 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/51
Grantees still filing
29/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JACKSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST: $50,000 · OtherJACKSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUSTMISHKAN TORAH: $15,644 · OtherMISHKAN TORAHIndividual grant recipient: $10,516 · OtherYAD YOSEF: $8,318 · Other+156 more: $146,198 · Other+156 moreMABAS FUND INC: $2,301 · EducationMATTEH MOSHE INC: $2,103 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC: $1,801 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1,703 · EducationMATTAN BASSETER INC: $501 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $501 · Education+1 more: $201 · EducationKEREN YOM TOV INC: $2,301 · ReligionYAD MISHKAN INC: $1,521 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $1,002 · ReligionTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $703 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA: $665 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $596 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $501 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $501 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LMAN ACHAI INC: $501 · Religion+4 more: $747 · ReligionA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,301 · Human ServicesAHAVA BABY INC: $1,300 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $1,080 · Human ServicesLEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $1,002 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,001 · Human ServicesWE LOVE TO HELP: $785 · Human ServicesCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $501 · Human ServicesEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $461 · Human Services+3 more: $354 · Human ServicesMIDRASH ZION CORP: $1,810 · PhilanthropySHALOM FOUNDATION: $861 · PhilanthropyGESHARIM INC: $561 · PhilanthropyLEV ELYAHU INC: $501 · PhilanthropyMITZADEI GAVER INC: $360 · Philanthropy+1 more: $52 · PhilanthropyTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $2,613 · Arts & CultureDEJ INTERNATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,015 · Arts & CultureSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $2,801 · Health
Other$230,676Education$9,111Religion$9,038Human Services$8,785Philanthropy$4,145Arts & Culture$3,628Health$2,801

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMekor Hayim Center Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $2,801 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $2,613 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,301 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $2,301 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $2,301 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $2,126 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMATTEH MOSHE INC: $2,103 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDRASH ZION CORP: $1,810 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC: $1,801 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1,703 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYAD MISHKAN INC: $1,521 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVA BABY INC: $1,300 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $1,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEJ INTERNATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,015 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $1,002 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $1,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlatbush Shomrim Safety Patrol Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWE LOVE TO HELP: $785 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $703 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA: $665 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $653 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNAI RAPHAEL CHESED ORGANIZATION IN: $601 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGESHARIM INC: $561 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV ELYAHU INC: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LMAN ACHAI INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $461 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMITZADEI GAVER INC: $360 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKOLLEL OHR MOSHE INC: $293 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHKY KOL YAAKAB INC: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIKKUN KLALI OLAMI INC CO LOUIS ASSOULIN: $201 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBikur Cholim of Staten Island Inc: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AYELET HASHACHAR INC: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMAT BET SHEMESH INC: $124 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHASHEM LOVES YOU INC: $52 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mekor Hayim Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds MABAS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MATTEH MOSHE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDRASH ZION CORP ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOAM ELIEZER INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YAD MISHKAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Ralph J Harary Founda…The Setton FoundationCabasso Family Founda…The Amin and Lillian …Chehebar Family Found…Jewish Communal FundThe Jimmy and Berta K…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY94.3× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 206 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home