Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reuben B & Helga M Resnik Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$989kEducation$931kPhilanthropy$360kHuman Services$337kInternational$111kRecreation & Sports$99kCivil Rights$83kYouth Development$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $156k
$16,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$78,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR$78,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA$22,750
FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF$16,250
DISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCH$16,250
UNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTY$16,250
SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC$16,250
SALVATION ARMY OF SARASOTA$16,250
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC$16,250
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE$13,000
THE MENNINGER CLINIC$13,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION CMTE$13,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY$9,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $96k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $96k → 17%UNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTY: $20k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $90k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $90k → 17%UNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTY: $19k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $78k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $78k → 17%UNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTY: $16k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $78k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $78k → 17%UNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTY: $16k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $77k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $77k → 17%UNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTY: $16k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN: $77k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $77k → 17%UNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA CNTY: $16k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $77k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $77k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN: $75k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $75k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN: $71k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $71k → 17%CAMP MAX STRAUS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA: $28k → 9%DISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCH: $20k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA: $26k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $19k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA: $23k → 9%DISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCH: $19k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA: $23k → 9%DISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCH: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA: $23k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY FNDN OF SARASOTA: $23k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA: $22k → 9%DISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCH: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY FNDN OF SARASOTA: $22k → 9%CAMP MAX STRAUS FOUNDATION: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY FNDN OF SARASOTA: $21k → 9%DISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCH: $16k → 14%SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $20k → 9%SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $19k → 9%SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $16k → 9%SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $16k → 9%SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $16k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 16 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$2.3M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

31%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +33%
  • TM
    THE MENNINGER CLINIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +14%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $16k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
9
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Camp Bob Waldorf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $496,332 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTRMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $223,181 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCERUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN: $223,181 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNDISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCH: $149,898 · OtherDISCOVERY FUND FOR EYE RESEARCHSALVATION ARMY OF SARASOTA: $149,898 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF SARASOTASENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $149,898 · OtherSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INCUNIVERSITY OF FL FOUNDATION INC: $133,648 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FL FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $119,919 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEEUNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTY: $103,402 · OtherUNITED WAY OF S SARASOTA COUNTYCAMP MAX STRAUS FOUNDATION: $98,648 · Other+2 more: $83,693 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $496,332 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH…+1 more: $16,250 · EducationTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $209,857 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $89,939 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $82,722 · InternationalTHE MENNINGER CLINIC: $119,919 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $51,250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,931,698Education$512,582Philanthropy$209,857International$172,661Health$119,919Recreation & Sports$51,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $496,332 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $209,857 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $149,898 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC: $119,919 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $89,939 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $82,722 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $51,250 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $16,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reuben B & Helga M Resnik Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reuben B & Helga M Resnik Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reuben B & Helga M Resnik Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph