Skip to content

· Public charity

Rethink Food NYC Inc

Our mission is to reduce food insecurity by developing practical models that distribute nutritionally dense, culturally sensitive meals to nourish healthy and thriving communities.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$192kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $37,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $40,321 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,721 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELFARE FOUNDATION INC$15,000
HARLEM WEEK INC$10,000
RETHINK FOOD USA$7,500
SKYLINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SANTLA: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 3 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$159k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-18%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Salem Community Service Council Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $120k
  • CF
    COLLECTIVE FOOD WORKS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $21k · revenue +226%
  • TS
    THE SKYLINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue -45%

Funded once

  • HN
    HAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Connect Co

Bridging the gaps in our food system to end hunger, build health, and eliminate food waste.

Food & Nutrition
2
Ny Community Fridge Corp

Using the power of volunteers and community partnerships to expand dignified access to food in the heart of disadvantaged communities.

Food & Nutrition
3
Nourishnyc I Inc
—
4
Food Jobs Work Foundation
Employment
5
New York City Love Kitchen Inc

Our mission is to feed and mend lives through food, social services and The Bread of Life.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food for Needy Inc
Food & Nutrition
7
Wellfare Inc

To transform the state of grocery and nutrition in low-income communities across the country.

—
8
Gotham Food Pantry Inc

Advance food justice by building community refrigerators and establishing food rescue operations in areas of high food insecurity with a focus on supporting new york city public housing residents.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank for New York City

The mission of food bank for new york city is to end hunger by organizing food, information and support for community survival and dignity.

Community Improvement
10
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
11
World Central Kitchen Inc

World central kitchen is first to the frontlines, providing meals in response (continued on sch o) to humanitarian, climate, and community crises.

International
12
Hartford Food System Inc

Fight hunger & improve nutrition for the disadvantaged via sustainable, non-emergency strategies.Programs are implemented to improve access to nutritious & affordable food, help consumers make informed food choices & advance responsible…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rethink Food Nyc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Welfare Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
1/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salem Community Service Council Inc: $120,000 · Food & NutritionSalem Community Service Council IncCOLLECTIVE FOOD WORKS INC: $21,169 · Food & NutritionCOLLECTIVE FOOD WORKS INCRETHINK FOOD USA INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionWELFARE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherWELFARE FOUNDA…HARLEM WEEK INC: $10,000 · OtherHARLEM WEEK IN…THE SKYLINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $17,840 · PhilanthropyTHE SKYLIN…HAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Food & Nutrition$148,669Other$25,000Philanthropy$17,840Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLECTIVE FOOD WORKS INC: $21,169 over 2y, 25% of budgetTHE SKYLINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $17,840 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWELFARE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM WEEK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRETHINK FOOD USA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rethink Food NYC Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rethink Food NYC Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rethink Food NYC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph