Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Alabama · Public charity

Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections

Protecting the rule of law in the qualifications for, process and administration of, and tabulation of voting in the united states.

$75k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$75,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$75,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$1.2M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$75kPublic Benefit$44k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Arizona Free Enterprise Club$75,00013%
Defend Your Vote$43,600164%

Compare Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections with peer funders

About Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections

How much does Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections give?
Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections reported 1 grants totaling $75,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Community Improvement (63%), Public Benefit (37%).
Who are Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Arizona Free Enterprise Club ($75k), Defend Your Vote ($44k).
Where is Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections based?
Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections is based in AL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home