Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Virginia · Private foundation

Reproduction Research Institute

$4k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Reproduction Research Institute’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Peachtree Collaborative, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2020
$4,153
Largest grant, FY2020
$4,153
States reached, FY2020
1

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2020.

Peachtree Collaborative$4,153

Compare Reproduction Research Institute with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reproduction Research Institute?

Find your warmest path to Reproduction Research Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Reproduction Research Institute

How much does Reproduction Research Institute give?
Reproduction Research Institute reported 1 grants totaling $4,153 in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does Reproduction Research Institute fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is Reproduction Research Institute based?
Reproduction Research Institute is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home