· Public charity
RepresentUs
RepresentUs is America's leading nonpartisan grassroots organization working for a government accountable to the people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Winning Connection | $29,796 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support "yes" vote on referendum dealing with national popular vote
To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact
Ballot issue political action committee to advocate for the defeat of a constitutional amendment that would require a 60% threshold for any future constitutional amendments.
Securing reforms to the electoral count act
To strengthen democracy in the United States through an assessment of US voting systems and US election administration from the perspective of global best practices.
Democracy for America Advocacy Fund (DFA-AF) is a 501(c)(4) organization that advocates for fair, just, inclusive, and equitable public policies that benefit all, not just a few. DFA-AF was launched to take on structural democracy reform…
To support legal, political & administrative efforts to protect fair voting.
Voter Protection Corps Foundation educates the public on how all eligible voters can participate in free and fair elections We provide nonpartisan education and resources to the public Our programs support community leaders volunteers and…
Informed and educated the public and lawmakers about the benefits of including independent voters in Pennsylvania's primary elections.
Voter Choice Arizona aims to educate Arizona voters about how Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), along with open primaries, will improve elections, give them more voice and more choice, and lead to better outcomes for our state.
Voter education around policy
Non-PartisanVoter Educ Advocacy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Choice Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Latino Community Fund of Washington State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMITTEE FOR RANKED CHOICE VOTING NYC INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA VOTERS FIRST ↗
- Who funds NORTH DAKOTANS FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds ELECTION ADMINISTRATION RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗
- Who funds Latino Community Fund of Washington State ↗
- Who funds VOTER CHOICE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Protect AR Constitution ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization RepresentUs funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.