Skip to content
Reinsurance Association of America at a glance

· Public charity

Reinsurance Association of America

The purposes of REINSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA are to assist members in protecting the interests of the industry; to act as the industry representative before congress, federal and state regulatory and administrative bodies and commissions, and the public; and to assist reinsurers in providing coverage and service responsive to the…

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$98kEducation$30kSocial Science$30kPublic Benefit$8k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $65,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $71,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $58k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION$17,500
THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS$10,000
RAND CORPORATION$10,000
AMERICAN CONSUMER INSTITUTE CENTER FOR CITIZEN RESEARCH$10,000
THE PROGRAM FOR PRESERVING THE NATURAL WORLD INC$10,000
INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS OF AMERICA INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE PROGRAM FOR PRESERVING THE NATURAL WORLD INC: $10k → 16%R STREET INSTITUTE: $8k → 14%AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION: $28k → 14%INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS OF AMERICA INC: $8k → 9%THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION: $18k → 14%THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 4 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$205k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    American Property Casualty Insurance Association
    4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +25%
  • AC
    American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +56%
  • TC
    THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • RS
    R STREET INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Property Casualty Insurance Association: $85,000 · Community ImprovementAmerican Property Casualty Insurance Asso…American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research: $40,000 · EducationAmerican Consumer Insti…R STREET INSTITUTE: $7,500 · EducationR STREET INSTITUTETHE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS: $40,000 · OtherTHE COUNCIL OF INSURANC…INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS OF AMERICA: $7,500 · OtherINDEPENDENT INSURANCE A…The Rand Corporation: $40,000 · Public BenefitThe Rand Corporatio…THE PROGRAM FOR PRESERVING THE NATURAL WORLD INC: $10,000 · Animals
Community Improvement$85,000Education$47,500Other$47,500Public Benefit$40,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Property Casualty Insurance Association: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PROGRAM FOR PRESERVING THE NATURAL WORLD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetR STREET INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reinsurance Association of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reinsurance Association of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reinsurance Association of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home