Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

West Virginia · Public charity

Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc

Provide the framework for workforce preparation and employment system.

$853k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$853,463
Largest grant, FY2025
$853,463
Organizations funded a year
1 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$537k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$853k0%
FY20241$803k0%
FY20231$1.1M0%
FY20221$1.2M0%
FY20211$1.0M0%
FY20202$803k0%
FY20192$797k0%
FY201813$1.2M0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$9.0M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Human Resource Development Foundation Inc$6,984,902937%
Workforce West Virginia$934,3334n/a
Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics$314,91322%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center$241,9292n/a
Fairmont State University$217,6872n/a
West Virginia Women Work$55,21225%
Weyerhaeuser Nr Company$48,4612n/a
North Central (Wv) Oic$38,00026%
Soles Electric Company$35,1722n/a
Art and Science Institute of Cosmetology$34,0002n/a
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Human Resource Development Foundation Inc$6,984,902937%
Workforce West Virginia$934,3334n/a
Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics$314,91322%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center$241,9292n/a
Fairmont State University$217,6872n/a
West Virginia Women Work$55,21225%
Weyerhaeuser Nr Company$48,4612n/a
North Central (Wv) Oic$38,00026%
Soles Electric Company$35,1722n/a
Art and Science Institute of Cosmetology$34,0002n/a
Laurel Business Institute$31,3452n/a
Bridgeport High School$24,2502n/a
Wv Junior College - Morgantown$22,0002n/a
City Neon Inc$10,2991n/a
Clarksburg Beauty Academy$10,0001n/a
Monongalia County Schools$5,1351n/a
Wv Junior College - Bridgeport$5,0001n/a

Compare Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc with peer funders

About Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc

How much does Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc give?
Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc reported 1 grants totaling $853,463 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Employment (100%).
Who are Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Human Resource Development Foundation Inc ($7.0M), Workforce West Virginia ($934k), Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics ($315k).
Does Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc based?
Region VI Workforce Investment Board Inc is based in WV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Region VI Workforce Investment Board’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home