Skip to content

Michigan · Public charity

Region II Commission on Services to the Aging

The area agency on aging's mission is to improve conditions affecting the lives of the older adults and individuals with disabilities in the region by: identifying concerns of those people and developing a comprehensive and coordinated network of services in hillsdale, jackson and lenawee counties that will enable older persons and…

$2.8M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Itemized grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$2.6M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$63,256
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,077,581
Organizations funded a year
5 to 5
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$20M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Region II Commission on Services to the Aging funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$2.6M50%
FY20245$2.8M0%
FY20235$2.9M0%
FY20225$2.7M0%
FY20215$2.7Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$11MCrime & Legal$363k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
County of Jackson Michigan Dept on Aging$6,283,7315n/a
Lenawee County Department on Aging$4,610,2725n/a
Hillsdale County Senior Services Center Inc$2,021,754517%
Michigan Advocacy Program$510,57950%
Catholic Charities of Jackson$166,06851%
Senior Resources of West Michigan$63,25610%
Region IV Area Agency on Aging Inc (With Foster Grandparents Program)$38,04510%
Branch Hillsdale St Joseph Cha$29,7681n/a
Region 3b Area Agency on Aging$20,00010%
Disability Connections Inc$17,15511%

Compare Region II Commission on Services to the Aging with peer funders

About Region II Commission on Services to the Aging

How much does Region II Commission on Services to the Aging give?
Region II Commission on Services to the Aging reported 10 itemized grants totaling $2,623,218, out of $2,816,727 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 5 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Region II Commission on Services to the Aging fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (97%), Crime & Legal (3%).
Who are Region II Commission on Services to the Aging's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: County of Jackson Michigan Dept on Aging ($6.3M), Lenawee County Department on Aging ($4.6M), Hillsdale County Senior Services Center Inc ($2.0M).
Does Region II Commission on Services to the Aging fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Region II Commission on Services to the Aging based?
Region II Commission on Services to the Aging is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Region II Commission on Services to the Aging’s filings →

More from the funding graph