Skip to content

· Private foundation

Red Bank Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$161k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$326kHuman Services$176kPhilanthropy$87kHealth$21kEducation$11kArts & Culture$2kInternational$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $700
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $161k
$10,203
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODHOUSE FAMILY CHARITY$160,559
FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,203
VNA$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $181k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $55k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $55k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $15k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $10k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$427k · 10 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$427k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+80%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $171k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GY
    GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $326k · revenue +48%
  • JI
    JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +36%
  • TL
    THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $6k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +80%
  • IR
    INDIAN RIVER HEALTHY START
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way Foundation of Indian River County Inc

The united way foundation is solely focused on building a permanent endowment to forever support the work of united way of indian river county. longterm in scope, the foundation affords donors the opportunity to leave a legacy and extend…

Philanthropy
2
United Way of Rhode Island Inc

United way's mission is uniting our community and resources to build racial equity and opportunities for all rhode islanders.

Philanthropy
3
Indian River Community Foundation Inc

Building a better community through donor-driven philanthropy.

Philanthropy
4
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
5
Grand Rapids Public Museum Foundation

The primary role of the grand rapids public museum foundation is fundraising for the grand rapids public museum, but it also has overall responsibility for the current and long-term viability of the organization.

Arts & Culture
6
The Jackson County United Way Inc

Jackson county united way assesses needs, secures resources and strategically invests those resources to create lasting, measurable change in the areas of education, health and financial stability for all people in jackson county.

Philanthropy
7
John F Finn Institute for Public Safety Inc

The organization is dedicated to the development of criminal justice strategies, programs, and practices that are effective, lawful, and procedurally fair through working with state and local criminal justice agencies, service providers,…

Crime & Legal
8
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
9
Inter American University of Puerto Rico

The universidad interamericana de puerto rico inc, is a higher education institution pursuing quality thru academic excellence with emphasis in the formation of people with higher standards, ethical and democratically values.

Education
10
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
11
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
12
Iowa Legal Aid

To strengthen Iowa's families and communities by providing free legal help that protects housing, safety, and income-and empowers people to build stable, independent lives. With 10 offices serving all 99 Iowa counties, Iowa Legal Aid helps…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Indian River County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vero Beach Museum of Art Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $326,000 · Human ServicesGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INCWOODHOUSE FAMILY CHARITY: $160,559 · OtherWOODHOUSE FAMILY CHARITYUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER: $63,650 · OtherUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVERJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $15,150 · OtherJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INCFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,203 · Other+11 more: $27,800 · Other+11 moreUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $6,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$326,000Other$277,362Philanthropy$13,000Education$7,000Arts & Culture$2,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $326,000 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $15,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Red Bank Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Red Bank Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • United Way of Indian River County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Red Bank’s filings →

More from the funding graph