Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$3.8MEducation$886kSocial Science$768kScience & Tech$480kFood & Nutrition$101k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.7M
$73,593
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEAL$187,500
LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE & TROPICAL MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF DISEASE CONTROL$187,483
AFRICAN POPULATION AND HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER$173,656
BURNET INSTITUTE$169,100
LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE & TROPICAL MEDICINE$164,604
BURNET INSTITUTE$124,066
UNIVERSITY OF ABOMEY-CALAVI (FACULTY OF AGRONOMIC SCIENCES)$101,289
HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (GLOBAL HEALTH AND POPULATION)$96,411
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$78,821
MALAWI UNIVERSITY OF BUSINESS AND APPLIED SCIENCES (WASHTED CENTRE)$73,593
THE BEHAVIOURAL INSIGHTS TEAM$66,171
HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (GLOBAL HEALTH AND POPULATION)$63,237
UHAS - UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND ALLIED SCIENCES$60,000
UHAS - UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND ALLIED SCIENCES$60,000
YALE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$59,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 23% of grant dollars ($1.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 77% that went abroad ($4.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (GLOBAL HEALTH AND POPULATION): $96k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $158k → 15%YALE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $120k → 12%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $42k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEAL: $188k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $126k → 19%HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (GLOBAL HEALTH AND POPULATION): $63k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $79k → 15%YALE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $60k → 12%EMORY UNIVERSITY - ROLLINS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $42k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $7k → 15%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $42k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 77% of all-years giving ($4.6M)

9 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$2.2M · 9 grants
Australia$631k · 4 grants
Kenya$521k · 2 grants
Singapore$480k · 2 grants
Ghana$300k · 3 grants
Bangladesh$213k · 3 grants
Benin$101k · 1 grant
Zimbabwe$99k · 2 grants
Malawi$74k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 10 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$4.5M
$665k

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $871k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.9M
  • BI
    BURNET INSTITUTE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $631k
  • AP
    AFRICAN POPULATION AND HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $521k

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $359k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND ALLIED SCIENCES
    one grant, 2023 · $180k
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $126k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE: $1,879,294 · OtherLONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINEBURNET INSTITUTE: $631,366 · OtherBURNET INSTITUTEAFRICAN POPULATION AND HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER: $520,968 · OtherAFRICAN POPULATION AND HEALTH RESEARCH CENTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE: $479,761 · OtherNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPOREYALE UNIVERSITY: $359,442 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $243,707 · OtherICDDRB: $213,091 · Other+10 more: $1,347,952 · Other+10 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $125,862 · EducationEmory University: $41,667 · EducationMA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH NURSES INC: $159,648 · Health
Other$5,675,581Education$167,529Health$159,648

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $125,862 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $41,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH NURSES INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph