Skip to content

· Public charity

Reach Community Development Inc

Reach develops and manages quality affordable apartment homes and provides opportunities for individuals, families and communities to thrive through supportive programs.

$1.3M
Granted FY2021
22
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$502k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Housing & Shelter$1.8M
02FY2021 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $383k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $362k
  • $250k+1 grant · $502k
$26,978
Median grant
1
States reached
$120M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REACH ARGYLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$502,473
CASCADIA VILLAGE APARTMENTS LLC$94,028
REACH GOT LLC$77,274
REACH 62ND AVENUE LLC$70,394
COVINGTON COMMONS LP$67,259
ALBINA CORNER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$52,637
REACH B49 PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$45,471
72ND AND FOSTER LP$36,173
REACH RITZDORF LLC$35,142
MCCULLER ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$33,811
PINE STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$26,978
FRUIT VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$26,558
FLOYD LIGHT APARTMENTS LLC$23,211
THE MEWS AT CV LLC$22,938
REACH GATEWAY SENIOR HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$22,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REACH ARGYLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $502k → 12%CASCADIA VILLAGE APARTMENTS LLC: $94k → 12%REACH GOT LLC: $84k → 12%REACH BLOCK 49 LLC: $84k → 12%REACH GOT LLC: $77k → 12%REACH 62ND AVENUE LLC: $70k → 12%ALBINA CORNER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $70k → 12%COVINGTON COMMONS LP: $67k → 12%ALBINA CORNER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $53k → 12%REACH WESTSHORE LLC: $48k → 12%REACH B49 PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 12%72ND AND FOSTER LP: $41k → 12%72ND AND FOSTER LP: $36k → 12%REACH RITZDORF LLC: $35k → 12%REACH ARGYLE GP LLC: $35k → 12%MCCULLER ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $34k → 12%PATTON SQUARE PARTNERS LP: $34k → 12%REACH ALLEN-FREMONT LLC: $32k → 12%REACH RITZDORF LLC: $31k → 12%PINE STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $27k → 12%REACH FLOYD LIGHT LLC: $27k → 12%FRUIT VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $27k → 12%REACH MCCULLER LLC: $23k → 12%FLOYD LIGHT APARTMENTS LLC: $23k → 12%REACH DRESDEN LLC: $23k → 12%THE MEWS AT CV LLC: $23k → 12%REACH GATEWAY SENIOR HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $22k → 12%SP TOWER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $21k → 12%REACH ALLEN-FREMONT LLC: $20k → 12%REACH LAURELHURST LLC: $20k → 12%RED CASTLE GAMES LLC: $17k → 12%PATTON SQUARE PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $17k → 12%REACH ISABELLA COURT LLC: $16k → 12%REACH GATEWAY LLC: $13k → 12%SP TOWER LP: $9k → 12%REACH DRESDEN LLC: $8k → 12%REACH LAURELHURST LLC: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 8 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$494k
$299k

Still filing today

0%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RG
    REACH GOT LLC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $162k
  • 7A
    72ND AND FOSTER LP
    2× · 2020–2021 · $77k
  • RR
    REACH RITZDORF LLC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $66k

Funded once

  • REACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $154k · revenue +75%
  • AC
    ALBINA CORNER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • RA
    REACH ARGYLE GP LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REACH ARGYLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $502,473 · OtherREACH ARGYLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPREACH GOT LLC: $161,773 · OtherREACH GOT LLCCASCADIA VILLAGE APARTMENTS LLC: $94,028 · OtherCASCADIA VILLAGE APARTMENTS LLC72ND AND FOSTER LP: $77,449 · OtherREACH 62ND AVENUE LLC: $70,394 · OtherALBINA CORNER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $70,241 · OtherCOVINGTON COMMONS LP: $67,259 · OtherREACH RITZDORF LLC: $66,010 · Other+18 more: $550,045 · Other+18 moreREACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $154,493 · Housing & ShelterREACH COM…
Other$1,659,672Housing & Shelter$154,493

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $154,493 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reach Community Development Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reach Community Development Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Reach Community Development Inc: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reach Community Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph