Skip to content

Michigan · Public charity

Rchs Football Booster Club

Provide team support and training

$2k
Granted FY2018
4
Grants FY2018
4
Organizations funded FY2018
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2018
$400
Largest grant, FY2018
$1,125
States reached, FY2018
1
Total assets, FY2018
$38k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Central Michigan University$3001n/a

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($2k), not named here.

Compare Rchs Football Booster Club with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rchs Football Booster Club?

Find your warmest path to Rchs Football Booster Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Rchs Football Booster Club

How much does Rchs Football Booster Club give?
Rchs Football Booster Club reported 4 grants totaling $2,125 in its FY2018 IRS filing.
What does Rchs Football Booster Club fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2018, its largest causes are Human Services (53%), Education (47%).
Who are Rchs Football Booster Club's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2018: Central Michigan University ($300).
Where is Rchs Football Booster Club based?
Rchs Football Booster Club is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rchs Football Booster Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph