Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raymond Martin & Melba P Gutierrez Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$944kReligion$180kHealth$165kArts & Culture$50kEnvironment$50kInternational$35kAnimals$15kMembership Benefit$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAREDO COLLEGE$35,000
ST AUGUSTINE HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
SACRED HEARTS CHILDRENS HOME$25,000
TEXAS AM ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STU$25,000
TEXAS AM NATIONAL HISPANIC$25,000
DIVINE MERCY CATHOLIC CHURCH$25,000
MARY HELP CHRISTIAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL$25,000
CLUB ROTARIO SANTANDER$25,000
SANTA MAGARITA DE ESCOCIA CATHOLIC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLUB ROTATIO NUEVO SANTANDER INC: $15k → 21%CLUB ROTARIO NUEVO SANTENDER: $20k → 21%LAREDO STROKE SUPPORT GROUP: $25k → 21%LAREDO STROKE SUPPORT GROUP INC: $10k → 21%LAREDO STROKE SUPPORT GROUP INC: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$673k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$1.0M
$508k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

55%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    4× · 2017–2023 · $364k · revenue +90%
  • LC
    Laredo College Education Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +9%
  • PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS
    2× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • AH
    AREA HEALTH ED CNTR MID RIO GRANDE BORDER AREA OF TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +48%
  • TA
    TEXAS A&M ASSOCIATION OF STUDENTS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lamar State College Port Arthur Foundation

The mission of the Lamar State College Port Arthur Foundation is to promote advance support encourage sponsor aid and advocate solely for Lamar State College Port Arthur.

Human Services
2
Laredo Area Community Foundation

To inspire by generosity and empower by a legacy of giving, the Laredo Area Community Foundation provides for the philanthropic needs of Laredo and surrounding communities.

Philanthropy
3
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
4
Western Texas College Foundation

The western texas college foundation serves western texas college by soliciting, receiving, and administering gifts and grants for student scholarships, educational and cultural activities, and campus facility improvement and development.

Education
5
Laredo Tennis Association

The purpose of the Laredo Tennis Association (a Texas nonprofit corporation) is to promote national or international amateur sports competition and grow the game of tennis in Laredo, TX and the surrounding areas among all age groups of…

Recreation & Sports
6
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
7
Lamar University Foundation Inc

The Foundation supports the development and promotion of Lamar University, its students, faculty and staff. The Lamar University Foundation supports and enhances Lamar University by encouraging the commitment of personal and financial…

Education
8
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Local North Texas Community Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Lone Star Foundation
—
11
Cen-Tex Hispanic Chamber of Comm

Lead and promote the business economic, social and cultural development of the Hispanic and small business community.

Community Improvement
12
Llano County Historical Society Inc

historic preservation and education

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laredo College Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Webb County Heritage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST AUGUSTINE SCHOOL: $115,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE SCHOOLTEXAS A&M UNIVERSSITY: $100,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSSITYLaredo College: $85,000 · OtherLaredo CollegeRUTH B COWL REHAB CENTER: $75,000 · OtherRUTH B COWL REHAB CENTERMARY HELP OF CHRISTIANS: $65,000 · OtherMARY HELP OF CHRISTIANSASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF: $50,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M ASSOCIATION OF STUDENTS: $50,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherST PETERS AND PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $45,000 · Other+18 more: $363,000 · Other+18 moreTexas A&M Foundation: $364,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationLaredo College Education Foundation: $75,000 · EducationLaredo College Education Foun…LAREDO STROKE SUPPORT GROUP INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesCLUB ROTARIO NUEVO SANTANDER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesAREA HEALTH ED CNTR MID RIO GRANDE BORDER AREA OF TEXAS INC: $50,000 · HealthPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $50,000 · EnvironmentWebb County Heritage Foundation: $50,000 · Arts & CultureThe Laredo Diploma Plus Foundation Inc: $35,000 · PhilanthropyBEST FRIENDS FOR LIFE INC: $15,000 · Animals
Other$998,000Education$439,000Human Services$75,000Health$50,000Environment$50,000Arts & Culture$50,000Philanthropy$35,000Animals$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $364,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLaredo College Education Foundation: $75,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetAREA HEALTH ED CNTR MID RIO GRANDE BORDER AREA OF TEXAS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWebb County Heritage Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLAREDO STROKE SUPPORT GROUP INC: $40,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetThe Laredo Diploma Plus Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetCLUB ROTARIO NUEVO SANTANDER INC: $35,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetBEST FRIENDS FOR LIFE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Laredo College Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AREA HEALTH ED CNTR MID RIO GRANDE BORDER AREA OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Webb County Heritage Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAREDO STROKE SUPPORT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds The Laredo Diploma Plus Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLUB ROTARIO NUEVO SANTANDER INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS FOR LIFE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Guadalupe and Lilia Martinez FoundationTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Guadalupe and Lilia Martinez Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond Martin & Melba P Gutierrez Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond Martin & Melba P Gutierrez Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raymond Martin & Melba P Gutierrez’s filings →

    More from the funding graph