Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raymond & Z Valeere Sass Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8kInternational$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kCivil Rights$2kEducation$2kArts & Culture$1kReligion$1kAnimals$775Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
4
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARYLAND CHAPTER FRIENDS OF IDF$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$600
Individual grant recipient$450
ZOA$300
ACT FOR AMERICA EDUCATION INC$200
JOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER$200
Individual grant recipient$100
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CAMERA COMMUNICATIONS: $300 → 16%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $500 → 14%ISRAEL TREES: $625 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $600 → 17%ACT FOR AMERICAN EDUCATION INC: $220 → 14%ACT FOR AMERICA EDUCATION INC: $200 → 10%BIKUR CHOLIM OF BALTIMORE INC: $500 → 11%CAMERA COMMUNICATIONS: $250 → 16%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $500 → 14%ISRAEL TREES: $500 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $600 → 17%ACT FOR AMERICA EDUCATION INC: $200 → 10%BIKUR CHOLIM OF BALTIMORE: $300 → 11%CAMERA COMMUNICATIONS: $200 → 16%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $250 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $500 → 17%MARYLAND CHAPTER FRIENDS OF IDF: $2k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $300 → 17%MARYLAND CHAPTER FRIENDS OF IDF: $1k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $1k → 19%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $300 → 17%MARYLAND CHAPTER FRIENDS OF IDF: $1k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $1k → 19%CEDARS SINAI: $350 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $250 → 17%MARYLAND CHAPTER FRIENDS OF IDF: $1k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $750 → 19%CEDARS SINAI: $200 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $200 → 17%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $450 → 19%CEDARS SINAI: $200 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $200 → 17%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $400 → 19%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $400 → 19%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $350 → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $350 → 19%ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $300 → 17%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $350 → 19%ZOA: $300 → 17%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $350 → 19%ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $300 → 17%JOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $350 → 19%ZOA: $300 → 17%JOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $200 → 19%ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $300 → 17%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $200 → 19%ZIONIST ORGANIZTION OF AMERICA: $215 → 17%WILMER EYE CLINIC: $200 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Raymond & Z Valeere Sass Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Raymond & Z Valeere Sass Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 17 repeat orgs$420 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$26k
$420

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+206%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsArts & CultureReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +53%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +51%
  • ZO
    ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA
    4× · 2018–2022 · $1k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • AF
    ACT FOR AMERICAN EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $220
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $200 · revenue +206%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Physicians for Palestine
Health
5
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
6
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

Aipac is an american grassroots organization that works to strengthen the u.s.-israel partnership. our mission is to encourage and persuade the u.s. government to enact specific policies that create a strong, enduring, and mutually…

International
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
11
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
12
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARYLAND CHAPTER FRIENDS OF IDF: $4,800 · OtherMARYLAND CHAPTER FRIENDS OF IDFJOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $4,050 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTERAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $2,750 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAHIndividual grant recipient: $2,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,610 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBALTIMORE BIKUR CHOLIM INC: $800 · Other+4 more: $1,520 · Other+4 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,750 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,350 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT IS…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $200 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,550 · Arts & CultureZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $1,115 · ReligionTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $400 · AnimalsTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $375 · AnimalsCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $750 · Health
Other$19,280International$3,300Arts & Culture$1,550Religion$1,115Animals$775Health$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $1,115 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE BIKUR CHOLIM INC: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISRAEL PROJECT: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE BIKUR CHOLIM INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ISRAEL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond & Z Valeere Sass Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond & Z Valeere Sass Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raymond & Z Valeere Sass Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph