· Private foundation
Ray & Sharon Haber Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k202 grants · $721k
- $10k–50k68 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 100000 AND UNDER | $179,134 |
| Individual grant recipient | $175,000 |
| YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH | $148,937 |
| KEREN SHULAMIT AND RACHEL (RABBI MANN) | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| YAD YOSEF TORAH CENTER | $98,806 |
| BET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH | $98,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $73,651 |
| KAMENITZER YESHIVA OF JERUSALEM | $55,000 |
| YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN | $52,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| BET YAAKOV BNEI TORAH | $40,000 |
| BETH MEDROSH GOVOHA OF ISRAEL | $36,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.
360 repeat relationships: 192 still active in FY2024, 168 since wound down; 91 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BMBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH5× · 2020–2024 · $246k · revenue +173%
- KYKamenitzer Yeshiva of Jerusalem5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +328%
- LDLIMUDEI DA'AS INC4× · 2020–2023 · $140k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- BMBETH MEDROSH GOHOVA OF ISRAELone grant, 2022 · $100k
- YAYESHIVA ATERET YISRAELone grant, 2022 · $26k
- ASAHAVAT SHALOMone grant, 2020 · $22k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
publish religious books
To expand torah education
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY
A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.
How this is measured
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 711 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ray & Sharon Haber Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ray & Sharon Haber Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
- Yeshiva Chayei Olam: 10% of income from government
- Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
- Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
- Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
- Tiferes Yisroel Inc: 5% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ray & Sharon Haber Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ray & Sharon Haber Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Ray & Sharon Haber’s filings →