Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ray & Elsie Catena Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$609k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $270k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$250,000
BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION$150,000
ALL SAINTS MEMORIAL CHURCH$120,000
SALESIAN SISTERS OF SAINT JOHN BOSCO$30,000
MOUNT DESERT LAND AND GARDEN PRESERVE$25,000
Breast Intentions Inc$10,000
SAFE WAY OUT A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION$10,000
INFINITE LOVE FOR KIDS FIGHTING CANCER A NJ NONPRO$5,000
FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC$5,000
MARTY'S PLACE SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY$3,000
BARBIS BLANKETS A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION$1,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthEnvironmentCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500k
  • BE
    BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $265k · revenue -6%
  • AS
    ALL SAINTS MEMORIAL CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $170k

Funded once

  • MC
    MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $57k · revenue -80%
  • HM
    Hackensack Meridian Health Medical Center
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • PF
    PIRRELLO FAMILY FOUNDATION 501C3 CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine Farmland Trust

Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.

Food & Nutrition
2
Longneck Manor Conservation Foundation

To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes

Animals
3
Monterey Bay Fisheries Trust

To ensure sustainable fisheries, resilient communities and a healthy ocean for years to come.

Animals
4
Save Barnegat Bay Inc

Our mission is to restore and protect barnegat bay and its ecosystem. we advance our mission by being a strong and independent voice for the bay throughout the watershed, including all of ocean and part of monmouth counties. we do this…

Environment
5
Duxbury Beach Reservation Inc

Preserve duxbury beach to safeguard adjacent bays and mainland, protect wildlife and vegetation while welcoming the public to enjoy.

Environment
6
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
7
Jersey Strong Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust Inc

Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust conserves and stewards vital natural areas, supports a vibrant local food system, and connects people with the natural world through inclusive education and recreation programs. Our goal is to protect our…

Environment
9
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
10
Massachusetts Farm Bureau Preservation F oundation Inc

Preservation of agricultural land.

Food & Nutrition
11
Bangor Land Trust

Protect for public benefit land and water in the bangor region that have special ecological, natural, scenic, agricultural, or recreational significance; increase public understanding of the value of land and water conservation.

Environment
12
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foodbank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc D/B/a Fulfill; the most unlike its peers is Forever Your Overwatch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherRIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONALL SAINTS MEMORIAL CHURCH: $170,000 · OtherALL SAINTS MEMORIAL CHURCHSALESIAN SISTERS OF SAINT JOHN BOSCO: $108,000 · OtherSALESIAN SISTERS OF SAINT JOHN BOSCO+5 more: $61,000 · Other+5 moreBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $265,000 · HealthBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATIONBREAST INTENTIONS INC: $10,000 · HealthMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $57,000 · EnvironmentFOREVER YOUR OVERWATCH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Crime & LegalTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $5,000 · Human ServicesMARTY'S PLACE SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $3,000 · AnimalsLUNCH BREAK INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$839,000Health$275,000Environment$57,000Crime & Legal$20,000Human Services$5,000Animals$3,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $265,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMount Desert Land and Garden Preserve: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOREVER YOUR OVERWATCH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ray & Elsie Catena Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ray & Elsie Catena Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ray & Elsie Catena Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph