Loading…
· Private foundation
RAMACHANDRA AND NIRANJINI REDDY
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$366k
Granted FY2023
30
Grants
6
Communities
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of RAMACHANDRA AND NIRANJINI REDDY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
education
2020
veteranswoundedhealthy living
2021
potentialchildrenachievewoundedveterans
2022
brain tumorsbaseballwisdommeansspiritual growthhistorytedx
2023
livespreventapproachhealthhinduextendedcreate
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 30 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k23 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$1,200
Median grant
6
States reached
$620k
Total assets
Largest grants
- AUGUSTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION$200,000
- HINDU TEMPLE OF ATLANTA$35,000
- GEORGIA CAROLINA COUNCIL$27,500
- CARAVAN CREATION$25,000
- AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$20,000
- VIA COGNITIVE HEALTH$15,000
- ROTARY CLUB OF AUGUSTA GEORGIA$10,510
- MIDTOWN ROBOTICS ALLIANCE$5,000
- IACA$4,000
- UNIVERSITY GEORGIA FOUNDATION$2,500
- ZERO - THE END OF PROSTATE CANCER$2,500
- MOVING AUGUSTA FORWARD INC$2,500
- RICHMOND COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE - GALA$1,300
- AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,200
- GREATER AUGUSTA ARTS COUNCIL$1,200
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 9%. 91% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 54% of RAMACHANDRA AND NIRANJINI REDDY’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 47% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
RAMACHANDRA AND NIRANJINI REDDYlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient addressRecipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$122k · 15 repeat orgs$414k to everyone else
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
15
37
Total granted
$122k
$100k
Still filing today
0%
27%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $314k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY4× · 2018–2021 · $36k
- GCGEORGIA CAROLINA COUNCIL2× · 2022–2023 · $29k
- IIACA4× · 2018–2023 · $12k
Funded once
- MCMEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIAone grant, 2021 · $50k
- KLKRISHNA LIFE INCone grant, 2022 · $10k
- LLLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY (LLS)- GEORGIA CAROLINAone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Augusta University Foundation Inc
Establishing and administering endowment funds for the benefit of augusta university.
—
2
Augusta Health Care Inc
The mission of Augusta Health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.
Health
3
Augustana University Association
A four-year liberal arts university affiliated with the evangelical lutheran church.
Education
4
Greater Augusta Regional Chamber of
—
5
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
Georgia tech research corporation advances research and technological development at georgia tech as it continually seeks to advance society and the global competitiveness of georgia and the nation. gtrc supports and promotes research…
Health
6
Fore Augusta Foundation Inc
Fore! augusta focuses efforts to operate first tee augusta, a 6-hole golf course with programs geared toward teaching children the game of golf.
Arts & Culture
7
Medical Association of Georgia
The foundation is a public charity enabling georgia physicians to support and engage in charitable and educational projects affecting medicine and public health.
Health
8
Augusta Genealogical Society
Collect, preserve, and disseminate knowledge and information in relation to genealogical, historical, biographical, and heraldic data.
Arts & Culture
9
Georgia Tech Athletic Association
The georgia tech athletic association forms the front porch of the georgia institute of technology (the institute) and serves as a gathering place for students, alumni, fans and friends. we provide our student-athletes with the opportunity…
Education
10
Georgia Alliance for Breast Cancer
Support Georgians by raising money for breast health and breast cancer programs.
Health
11
Augusta University Research Institute
To obtain funds for augusta university (au) for research, development, and other programs.
Education
12
Georgia State Golf Association
Promotion of game/rules of golf throughout the state of georgia
Recreation & Sports
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Augusta Museum of History Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$508,152Health$23,500Recreation & Sports$2,000Youth Development$1,000Arts & Culture$775Philanthropy$400
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AUGUSTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VIA COGNITIVE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds APPARO ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ZERO - THE END OF PROSTATE CANCER ↗
- Who funds GREENBRIER FISHING TEAM ↗
- Who funds GREATER AUGUSTA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds EMPTY STOCKING FUND ↗
- Who funds GREATER ATLANTA TELUGU ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation for the CentralGA24.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Central · Creel-Harison Foundation Inc · The Knox Foundation · Arthur H Merry & Ernest B Merry · Porter Fleming Fdn Tr Ua · Augusta Convention & Visitors Bureau · Kirby Family Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation RAMACHANDRA AND NIRANJINI REDDY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AUGUSTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~43 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 11.2× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 581750663 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AUGUSTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 43 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Ramachandra and Niranjini Reddy?
Find your warmest path to Ramachandra and Niranjini Reddy through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines