Skip to content
Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
478
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$558k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0163% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$6.1MEducation$1.2MHuman Services$771kHealth$478kFood & Nutrition$246kPhilanthropy$231kInternational$193kArts & Culture$161kOther$0
02FY2024 · 478 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k374 grants · $591k
  • $10k–50k81 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$1,066
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$558,200
YAD YOSEF$430,862
Individual grant recipient$331,964
Individual grant recipient$130,800
MAGEN DAVID CONGREGATION OF SURFSIDE$128,601
BARKAI FOUNDATION$118,000
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA$90,000
FRIENDS OF AHAVAT SHALOM$90,000
OR HATORAH HIGH SCHOOL$77,000
Individual grant recipient$76,000
SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND$72,000
CARMEI HAIR INTERNATION$68,000
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM$61,201
Individual grant recipient$60,512
SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER$58,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $708k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND: $5k → 12%SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $59k → 11%SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $54k → 11%SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $52k → 11%EZER ELIYAHU: $10k → 10%EZER ELIYAHU: $10k → 10%SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $18k → 11%SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $18k → 11%SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $18k → 11%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $5k → 11%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $3k → 11%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $2k → 20%MY SOLDIER INC: $10k → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $78k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $61k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $50k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $45k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $10k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $10k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%THE DEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%BONEI OLAM: $36k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $12k → 20%MISASKIM: $10k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP (WLTH): $7k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP (WLTH): $4k → 20%ATIME: $12k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $7k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $5k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $4k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP (WLTH): $1k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP (WLTH): $1k → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $5k → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD
AR
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 456 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

456 repeat relationships: 361 still active in FY2024, 95 since wound down; 112 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

456
237

Total granted

$14M
$584k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+3%

Still filing today

22%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $535k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $401k · revenue +205%
  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $291k · revenue +33%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $246k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • AE
    AHI EZER CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $36k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
6
Ziv Israel Association
—
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
9
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
10
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
11
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
12
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

178 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 178 of the 807 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
168/178
Grantees still filing
115/178
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YAD YOSEF: $1,459,598 · OtherYAD YOSEFIndividual grant recipient: $1,361,960 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $708,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $395,200 · Other+145 more: $6,700,279 · Other+145 moreSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $401,000 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $110,400 · ReligionKEHILAT ZION INC: $78,800 · ReligionSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC: $60,000 · ReligionShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $50,800 · ReligionMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $33,400 · Religion+9 more: $137,300 · ReligionMATTAN BASSETER INC: $210,202 · EducationBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $59,516 · EducationKEREN ESTHER FOUNDATION: $57,000 · EducationBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $56,400 · EducationMIGDAL OHR INTERNATIONAL INC: $36,000 · EducationTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $34,000 · Education+6 more: $94,214 · EducationSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $291,001 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $218,800 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $57,800 · Human ServicesWE LOVE TO HELP WLTH INC: $23,400 · Human Services+6 more: $87,860 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $285,600 · PhilanthropyTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $113,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $70,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $59,001 · Philanthropy+3 more: $38,800 · PhilanthropyNew York Cancer Center Inc: $114,400 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $106,546 · HealthSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $45,000 · HealthMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $11,000 · HealthTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $246,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$10,625,737Religion$871,700Education$757,332Human Services$678,861Philanthropy$566,401Health$276,946Food & Nutrition$261,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $401,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $291,001 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $285,600 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $246,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $218,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $210,202 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $114,400 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $113,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $110,400 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $106,546 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $69,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $68,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC: $60,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $59,516 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $59,001 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $58,680 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $57,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN ESTHER FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $56,400 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $50,800 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $45,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $43,101 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $40,600 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $36,600 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMIGDAL OHR INTERNATIONAL INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $34,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $33,400 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $26,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW: $23,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetIMAGINE ACADEMY: $23,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJUST ONE LIFE INC: $22,600 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $22,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetEZER ELIYAHU INC CO MARCOS ZALTA: $20,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $19,800 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $19,001 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $17,613 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $17,600 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $15,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $14,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHELLY COHEN BRIDAL FUND: $14,600 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $14,300 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetNavat Yisrael: $14,200 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetNISSIM VENIFLAOT: $14,100 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $13,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MATTAN BASSETER INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIFERET RABBI AKIVA ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEHILAT ZION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Jimmy and Berta K…The Amin and Lillian …The Adjmi-Dwek Founda…The Howard Hoffman & …Chehebar Family Found…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…The Setton FoundationIsaac & Marjorie Gind…Cabasso Family Founda…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…The Foop Foundation
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY201× affinity154 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Ywca of Greater Portland: 15% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Bnot Shirah of Deal Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 807 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ralph J Harary’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home