Skip to content

· Private foundation

Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2019
32
Grants FY2019
8
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $89k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

17
’18
10
’19
4
’20
4
’21
4
’22
4
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$308kEducation$187kPhilanthropy$120kHealth$41kInternational$16kHuman Services$11kPublic Benefit$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k31 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION$50,050
MARCH OF DIMES$9,000
HINDU SOCIETY OF NEF$8,566
Individual grant recipient$6,000
HINDU SOCIETY OF NEF$3,000
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$1,101
HINDU SOCIETY OF NEF$1,001
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENS$1,000
OXFAM AMERICA$1,000
FINCA$1,000
MARCH OF DIMES$1,000
HINDU SOCIETY OF NEF$1,000
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICNA$1,000
HINDU SOCIETY OF NEF$501
HINDU SOCIETY OF NEF$501
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $70) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $70 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
MN
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 12% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 5%.

Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 19 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2019, 9 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$549k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+26%

Still filing today

42%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    2× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +11%
  • FI
    FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +31%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $1k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • PP
    PAWS PURPLE HEARTS
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +89%
  • U
    USO
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
3
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
4
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
5
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
10
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
11
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
12
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION: $418,171 · OtherEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATIONHINDU SOCIETY OF NEF: $50,515 · OtherHINDU SOCIETY OF NEFIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · Other+34 more: $31,208 · Other+34 moreVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $120,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $20,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $4,501 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3,600 · Health+3 more: $280 · HealthSave The Children Federation Inc: $11,500 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,250 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,480 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · International+2 more: $550 · InternationalLeadership Institute: $3,000 · Public BenefitSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $1,350 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $21 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$523,894Philanthropy$120,000Health$28,381International$17,780Public Benefit$3,000Recreation & Sports$1,371Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $4,501 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,480 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS LIFE AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUTTS WITH A MISSION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND FOR AMERICA INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $21 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS LIFE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Radha Devi Joshi Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Radha Devi Joshi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph