Skip to content

· Private foundation

R S & P Zarnegin Family Foundation

$40k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$125kEducation$18kFood & Nutrition$9kHealth$3kHuman Services$2kHousing & Shelter$500
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$8,188
Median grant
2
States reached
$3
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD NORTH BEVERLY HILLS$18,000
CHABAD SUNSET STRIP$9,526
Individual grant recipient$8,188
CHABAD TOPANGA$2,800
CHABAD IN THE HILLS$1,800
HAWTHORNE PTA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FULLFILLMENT FUND: $700 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 7 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
20

Total granted

$105k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+78%

Still filing today

29%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CHABAD NORTH BEVERLY HILLS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $74k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF SUNSET STRIP
    2× · 2018–2020 · $16k
  • CI
    CHABAD IN THE HILLS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $9k

Funded once

  • CI
    CHABAD IN THE HILLS -RABBI & MRS MORDECHAI KIRSCHENBAUM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • M
    MILKENSCHOOLORG
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • MC
    MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +148%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
2
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
5
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
6
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
Partnership for Los Angeles Schools

We transform schools to revolutionize school systems, empowering all students with a high-quality education. the partnership's goals are to 1) dramatically accelerate achievement for students in the district's highest need and historically…

Education
9
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
10
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
11
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
12
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is El Rodeo Elementary Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD NORTH BEVERLY HILLS: $74,250 · OtherCHABAD NORTH BEVERLY HILLSCHABAD OF SUNSET STRIP: $16,276 · OtherCHABAD OF SUNSET STRIPCHABAD IN THE HILLS -RABBI & MRS MORDECHAI KIRSCHENBAUM: $10,000 · OtherCHABAD IN THE HILLS -RABBI & MRS MORDECHAI KIRSCHENBAUMCHABAD IN THE HILLS: $8,800 · OtherCHABAD IN THE HILLSIndividual grant recipient: $8,188 · OtherMILKENSCHOOLORG: $7,500 · OtherMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5,540 · Other+17 more: $23,454 · Other+17 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $95 · HealthFULFILLMENT FUND: $700 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$154,008Health$1,595Human Services$700Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5,540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAT NAM FOUNDATION INC: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $95 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds EL RODEO ELEMENTARY PTA ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SAT NAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R S & P Zarnegin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R S & P Zarnegin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on R S & P Zarnegin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph